2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00374-004-0820-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Barley yield and soil microbial and enzyme activities as affected by contamination of two soils with lead, zinc or copper

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
44
2
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
4
44
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The effects of nanomaterials on general soil processes and nutrient cycling were evaluated using four different enzyme activities. These enzyme activities are excellent indicators of soil microbial function, are key components in nutrient cycling (23,34,35), and have been applied in studies assessing soil quality and management (36). Soil acid phosphatase is an important enzyme in the catalysis of organic phosphate esters into inorganic phosphate, which is important in phosphorus mineralization and processing (37,38).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of nanomaterials on general soil processes and nutrient cycling were evaluated using four different enzyme activities. These enzyme activities are excellent indicators of soil microbial function, are key components in nutrient cycling (23,34,35), and have been applied in studies assessing soil quality and management (36). Soil acid phosphatase is an important enzyme in the catalysis of organic phosphate esters into inorganic phosphate, which is important in phosphorus mineralization and processing (37,38).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been repeatedly shown that heavy metals have a negative impact not only on the size, activity and diversity of soil microbial communities (Chander et al 2001), but they also affect soil enzymes (Belyaeva et al 2005). Soil enzyme activity is a reliable indicator reflecting the biological situation in soils and it is possible to very quickly obtain credible results of soil pollution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…± value represents SE. N 4 -ammonium nitrate; P 2 -superphosphate; K 2 -potassium chloride; FM -farmyard manure; PL -poultry litter centrations recorded by other authors in barley grain: 0.4-9.5 mg/kg by Belyaeva et al (2005) 2.3-9 mg/kg by Smart et al (1992) and 5.2-6.0 mg/kg by Cox et al (2001). Concentrations of Mn recorded by other authors were the same or higher than the concentrations in our study: 11-69 mg/kg by Smart et al (1992) and 12-13 mg/kg by Cox et al (2001).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…This can be explained by a dilution effect and by the low ability of barley to accumulate Cu (Belyaeva et al 2005). Concentrations of Cu in our study were lower to or comparable with con- Yield (t/ha)* 4.0 a ± 0.2 9.6 b ± 0.2 9.7b ± 0.2 7.4 b ± 0.2 ns Result of one-way ANOVA was not significant; *result of ANOVA was significant at 0.05 probability level.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%