2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2014.06.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Barley–pea intercropping: Effects on land productivity, carbon and nitrogen transformations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
46
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
7
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This can be achieved by testing soil to optimise nutrient requirements (including micronutrients) of major field crops using the 4R principles (i.e., right source, right rate, right time and right place); designing low cost and sustainable agro-ecosystems (e.g., cover crops/intercropping, crop rotation, conservation tillage, adoption of 4R nutrient management strategies, etc.) that reduce the use of synthetic fertilisers in crop production; and by providing tools and practices (i.e., genetic selection, optimal crop and soil management practices, and field testing of precision agriculture techniques) that sustain ecosystem services, input efficiency and environmental quality while adapting to climatic extremes [17][18][19][20][21][22]. Selection of crops and/or varieties with different root architectures (i.e., longer and finer roots, including greater number of tips and branching angle, and a lower shoot: root ratio) may also help tolerate drought conditions [23,24].…”
Section: Testing/adoption Of Appropriate Crops and Cropping Systems Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be achieved by testing soil to optimise nutrient requirements (including micronutrients) of major field crops using the 4R principles (i.e., right source, right rate, right time and right place); designing low cost and sustainable agro-ecosystems (e.g., cover crops/intercropping, crop rotation, conservation tillage, adoption of 4R nutrient management strategies, etc.) that reduce the use of synthetic fertilisers in crop production; and by providing tools and practices (i.e., genetic selection, optimal crop and soil management practices, and field testing of precision agriculture techniques) that sustain ecosystem services, input efficiency and environmental quality while adapting to climatic extremes [17][18][19][20][21][22]. Selection of crops and/or varieties with different root architectures (i.e., longer and finer roots, including greater number of tips and branching angle, and a lower shoot: root ratio) may also help tolerate drought conditions [23,24].…”
Section: Testing/adoption Of Appropriate Crops and Cropping Systems Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, intercropping (with or without legumes), fertilizer management, crop rotations and reduced tillage practices can lead to lower external inputs, efficient crop nutrient use and yield improvements (Scalise et al 2015;Dahmardeh and Hodiani 2016;Jouzi et al 2017). Benefits for the soil can also be realized through improved biological and chemical characteristics (Oelbermann and Echarte 2011;Chapagain and Riseman 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typical species used in intercropping systems include legumes such as clover (Trifolium), vetch (Vicia), beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) and peas (Pisum sativum) and non-legumes such as barley (Hordeum vulgare), buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum), rye (Secale cereale), oat (Avena sativa), wheat (Triticum) and flax (Linum usitatissimum) (Chapagain and Riseman 2014;Hamzei and Seyyedi 2016). Intercropping with legumes can particularly enhance soil fertility by increasing soil nitrogen (N) through the N-fixing ability of rhizobacteria, thereby allowing more fixed-N to remain in the upper soil layers and be plant available (Hauggaard-Nielsen et al 2009a;Chapagain and Riseman 2014). Intercropping has been found to increase the use of available N (Bedoussac and Justes 2010) as well as macro-and micronutrients in crops (Neugschwandtner and Kaul 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intra-species variation in biological nitrogen fixation has been observed throughout the legume family [30,87] including within Glycine max (soybean) [88], Lablab purpureus [89], Vicia faba (faba bean) [90,91], Trifolium alexandrinum (bersem clover) [36,[92][93][94], Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean) [95,96], Pisum sativum (green pea) [97], V. unguiculata (cowpea) [98], and Vigna aconitifolia (mothbean) [93]. Optimizing biological nitrogen fixation involves the selection of not only the best legume genotype but also selecting the most optimal legume and rhizobia combination [30].…”
Section: Dry Season Wild Plants Can Be Optimized As Cover Crops Throumentioning
confidence: 99%