2022
DOI: 10.1016/s2213-2600(22)00088-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Baricitinib versus dexamethasone for adults hospitalised with COVID-19 (ACTT-4): a randomised, double-blind, double placebo-controlled trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
58
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(20 reference statements)
2
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, it appears that the JAK inhibitor baricitinib is the most effective treatment, even conferring added benefit in the presence of antivirals and other immune modulators. The ACTT-4 trial, which showed no difference between baricitinib and dexamethasone in the presence of remdesivir, is consistent with one advantage of baricitinib, namely, its anti-viral properties [77].…”
Section: Il-1 Blocking Antibodiessupporting
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, it appears that the JAK inhibitor baricitinib is the most effective treatment, even conferring added benefit in the presence of antivirals and other immune modulators. The ACTT-4 trial, which showed no difference between baricitinib and dexamethasone in the presence of remdesivir, is consistent with one advantage of baricitinib, namely, its anti-viral properties [77].…”
Section: Il-1 Blocking Antibodiessupporting
confidence: 53%
“…It is also noticeable that even in the presence of dexamethasone, baricitinib, tofacitinib, and tocilizumab have all been shown to confer enhanced protection in randomised SoC-controlled clinical trials. There have not been many direct comparisons of the immune modulators in COVID-19 trials, except in the recently published ACTT-4 trial where the effect of baricitinib with remdesivir plus SoC was compared with dexamethasone plus remdesivir and SoC [77]. In this study there was no difference in survival of patients requiring supplemental oxygen, but there were significantly more grade 3 or 4 adverse events in the dexamethasone group.…”
Section: Low Dose Glucocorticoidsmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Relevant published evidence has already been partly systematically reviewed and/or meta-analyzed. Pertinent, prominent examples include (1) noninvasive techniques of respiratory support (e.g., high-flow nasal canula, continuous positive airway pressure), prone positioning (for ≥16 consecutive hours per day with lung-protective ventilation) and veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) of varying severity [ 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 ]; (2) use of RCT evidence-supported physiological targets such as ventilator driving pressure of <15 cmH 2 O during low-tidal volume ventilation in ARDS [ 11 ]; (3) adjunctive hydrocortisone with or without fludrocortisone in septic shock, and dexamethasone in ARDS (of COVID-19 or non-COVID-19 etiology) [ 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 ]; (4) targeted temperature management (e.g., hypothermia or normothermia with target temperature of 33 or ≤37.5 °C, respectively) after cardiac arrest [ 17 , 18 , 19 ]; (5) vasopressin, stress-dose steroids, and epinephrine in in-hospital cardiac arrest [ 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 ]; (6) early inhibition of fibrinolysis by tranexamic acid in acute severe bleeding due to trauma and in postpartum hemorrhage [ 25 , 26 , 27 ]; (7) nucleotide inhibition of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 RNA-dependent RNA polymerase [ 28 , 29 ]; and (8) immunomodulating interventions such as interleukin (IL)-6 receptor blockade, Janus kinase inhibition, or IL-1 alpha and IL-1 beta antagonism guided by soluble urokinase plasminogen receptor plasma levels in COVID-19 [ 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 ].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the COVID-19 pandemic, intensive care practice was guided by the prompt issuance of guidelines including recommendations based on both direct and indirect (i.e., extrapolated from other viral pneumonias) evidence [ 4 ] and by an abundance of concurrently emerging RCT data [ 8 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 ]. Furthermore, two simplified models of COVID-19-related ARDS (CARDS) were proposed as opposite extremes of a pathophysiological spectrum that includes “intermediate stages” with overlapping characteristics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%