2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2019.08.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bariatric surgery in the elderly: outcomes analysis of patients over 70 using the ACS-NSQIP database

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
1
5

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
10
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…As reported previously [9], the weight loss over time was also somewhat reduced in older patients. However, in contrast to previous reports [28], we were unable to detect any relation between postoperative relative weight loss and improvements in any aspects of QoL (data not shown). Previous studies have shown that also a modest weight loss in the range of 5% is associated with improvements in QoL over 1 to 2 years, irrespective if this was achieved by surgery or by conservative means [29].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…As reported previously [9], the weight loss over time was also somewhat reduced in older patients. However, in contrast to previous reports [28], we were unable to detect any relation between postoperative relative weight loss and improvements in any aspects of QoL (data not shown). Previous studies have shown that also a modest weight loss in the range of 5% is associated with improvements in QoL over 1 to 2 years, irrespective if this was achieved by surgery or by conservative means [29].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…However, the reproducibility of safety and efficacy of this intervention in the extremes of age has been controversial [3][4][5] . In older, frail individuals, the perioperative and short-term safety of the intervention has been called into question; while in adolescent and younger individuals, the long-term metabolic and developmental effects are often cited as areas of concern and not well understood [6][7][8][9] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Die Abwägung des individuellen perioperativen Risikos beeinflusst die Wahl der Operationsmethode zum Teil entscheidend. Bei Patienten mit hohem Risiko (EOSS 3 – 4, u. a. Herzinsuffizienz, Niereninsuffizienz, Leberzirrhose, Z. n. Organtransplantation) hat die Sleeve-Gastrektomie im Vergleich zu den Bypassverfahren ein geringeres Morbiditäts- und Letalitätsrisiko 12 . Sind intraabdominell nach vorhergehenden Operationen erhebliche Adhäsionen insbesondere der Darmschlingen zu erwarten, bietet sich die Sleeve-Gastrektomie ebenfalls als das Verfahren der Wahl an.…”
Section: Standardoperationen – Wirkprinzipienunclassified