2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2015.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bariatric and metabolic outcomes in the super-obese elderly

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(54 reference statements)
1
14
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with other studies in patients with super obesity (BMI ≥50 kg/m 2 ), the %EWL after LMGB in the present study is higher than that after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (mean 40.2%, 49.5%, and 35.6%), whereas the weight loss effect is similar to or slightly less than that of LRYGB (mean 55.0%, 55.8%, and 51.0%) [18][19][20].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 81%
“…Compared with other studies in patients with super obesity (BMI ≥50 kg/m 2 ), the %EWL after LMGB in the present study is higher than that after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (mean 40.2%, 49.5%, and 35.6%), whereas the weight loss effect is similar to or slightly less than that of LRYGB (mean 55.0%, 55.8%, and 51.0%) [18][19][20].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 81%
“…Seventeen studies showed results on diabetes resolution, ranging from 33% 42 to 83%, 33 , 40 with a pooled mean of 54.5% (95% CI 39.1–69.1; Figure 5 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 For the comparison of different bariatric surgery types, data were available from one systematic review, 28 two RCTs, 29,30 and 18 retrospective cohorts. [31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48] The majority of studies involved mostly women aged 35 to 45 years. We rated the systematic review as fair quality, 28 one RCT (in four studies) as low risk of bias, 29,[49][50][51] and one RCT as unclear risk of bias.…”
Section: Literature Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%