Baremación de una prueba estandarizada de resúmenes (RESUMeV) para los niveles de 4° y 6° de educación primaria

Abstract

Baremación de una prueba estandarizada de resúmenes (RESUMeV) para los niveles de 4º y 6º de educación primaria Primer premio de la XXI edición del Premio de Psicología Aplicada "Rafael Burgaleta" 2014

Selective attention to question-relevant text information precedes high-quality summaries: Evidence from eye movements

“…In addition, the rating of the quality of the summaries on the basis of their content and coherence [ 43 , 47 ] proved to be valid in the sense that it differentiated readers who demonstrated different processing strategies. Readers who produced more elaborated and detailed summaries that included most of the relevant points and the causal connectors between them, also showed sensitivity to relevance and more coherence-building strategies during the course of reading.…”

“…Each participant generated an oral summary after reading each of the six experimental texts. The summaries were recorded and transcribed, and then scored on the basis of two criteria: content and coherence [ 43 , 47 ]. Each text was evaluated by three independent raters on a 5-point scale (0-4 points); the inter-rater agreement (Cohen´s Kappa) ranged from .68 to .94.…”

“…These criteria have been proved to be useful for assessing reading comprehension [ 33 , 34 , 38 , 40 ]. The reliability and validity of a summary test, which is based on scoring the content and coherence of summaries, has been shown to be good [ 37 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 43 , 47 ]. For example, León et al [ 47 ] demonstrated that a summary test (RESUMeV), in which the quality of the summaries is scored for content and coherence, has high reliability (interrater r ’s .69-.97, for four independent raters).…”

“…The reliability and validity of a summary test, which is based on scoring the content and coherence of summaries, has been shown to be good [ 37 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 43 , 47 ]. For example, León et al [ 47 ] demonstrated that a summary test (RESUMeV), in which the quality of the summaries is scored for content and coherence, has high reliability (interrater r ’s .69-.97, for four independent raters). León, Escudero, Olmos, Moreno and Martín [ 48 ] showed that the summary task scores correlate highly ( r = .82) with multiple choice test performance, indicating that the summary task is a valid measure of reading comprehension.…”

“…These criteria have been proved to be useful for assessing reading comprehension (see e.g., Armbruster et al, 1987;Cordero-Ponce, 2000;Nelson & Smith, 1992;Thomas & Bridge, 1980). The reliability and validity of a summary test, which is based on scoring the content and coherence of summaries, has been shown to be good (e.g., León et al, 2006;León, Escudero, Olmos, Sanz, Dávalos & García, 2009;León, Escudero & Olmos, 2012;León, Olmos, Perry, Jorge-Botana & Escudero, 2013;León, Moreno, Arnal, Escudero & Olmos, 2015). For example, demonstrated that a summary test (RESUMeV), in which the quality of the summaries is scored for content and coherence, has high reliability (interrater r's .69-.97, for four independent raters).…”