Republic is a noun in search of an adjective. Indeed, as a taxonomic term it seems to withdraw a Linnaean level with every generation. Virtually every modern government, regardless of its actual conduct, claims as its primary concern public things, the res publica. As a result, the particular adjective used to qualify the republican claim, liberal, democratic, people's, and Islamic, becomes necessary to indicate the sort of concern for things public. Of course, these adjectives possess curious qualities. Indeed, in the last two centuries the more emphatic the invocation of the public in name, the less likely in practice that the populace has any share in deliberations on political matters. As a result of this semantic confusion, understanding the republican form increasingly means not only looking across polities, but perhaps more essentially, across time.Here the semantic sleight of hand that characterizes so much modern political description disappears. In the ancient world in particular a government genuinely concerned with public things, a government committed to the very idea of public things stood in stark contrast to its alternatives. It is this essential comparison that illuminates this latest iteration of the Ancient Lessons for Global Politics volumes.If in our own time the adjective is everything, in the ancient world the noun was all. the very idea of a government concerned with the things public forcefully affirmed the presence of a public concerned with government. to call one's polis a republic was to stand out against a horizon dominated by oligarchic, monarchic, and imperial alternatives. As thucydides's Pericles declares in his funeral oration, "this is a peculiarity of ours: we do not say that a man who takes no interest in politics is a man who minds his own business, we say that he has no business at all." 1 It is this vision of republicanism, civic republicanism