1982
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2028.1982.tb00295.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Baobabs and elephants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To sample all available age classes turned out to be problematic, since baobabs of several age classes show different growth rates (swart 1963;GUy 1970;GUy 1982;BreitenBaCh 1985) and react quite individually to poor, inconsistent or heavy rainfall. Two neighbouring baobab trees growing under the same site conditions were found to show strongly different growth trends over the last 19 years; most likely due to age differences expressed by circumference (Bao20: 2.5 m, Bao21: 5.5 m).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To sample all available age classes turned out to be problematic, since baobabs of several age classes show different growth rates (swart 1963;GUy 1970;GUy 1982;BreitenBaCh 1985) and react quite individually to poor, inconsistent or heavy rainfall. Two neighbouring baobab trees growing under the same site conditions were found to show strongly different growth trends over the last 19 years; most likely due to age differences expressed by circumference (Bao20: 2.5 m, Bao21: 5.5 m).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In at least some dry forests, increasing numbers of elephants progressively destroy the forest and convert it into more open habitats (Laws, 1970;Barnes, 1980Barnes, , 1983Douglas-Hamilton, 1987;Dublin, Sinclair & McClade, 1990;Jachman & Croes, 1991;Dublin, 1994;Leuthold, 1996;see Lawton & Gough (1970), Guy (1982) and Ben-Shahar (1996) for alternative explanations). In KNP, elephants also suppress the rejuvenation of selected woodland trees (Viljoen, 1988;Trollope et al, in press).…”
Section: Why Control Elephant Numbers?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taken with the results of other aerial elephant surveys conducted post 1992 drought, elephants in Gonarezhou have increased at a mean annual rate of 6% during the past sixteen years. Such a high elephant population annual rate with a population density of 2 elephants km -2 is a cause for concern to a park the size of Gonarezhou (Dunham 2012), especially considering the role of elephants in structuring ecosystems (Guy 1982;Cumming et al 1997;Midgley et al 2005;Guldemond and Van Aarde 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%