2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2015.09.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Banks and capital requirements: Channels of adjustment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
93
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
5
93
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The downward trend in the first three panels of Figure 1 is more pronounced for risk-weighted capital ratios (the shaded area indicates the post-Lehman period). The fact that the risk-based leverage fell more strongly than the other leverage measures in response to the crisis suggests that banks could have invested in assets with lower risk weights, although there is evidence that banks from the advanced economies increased capital through equity issuance, cuts in dividends and increases in retained earnings (Cohen and Scatigna, 2014). As one can see from the last panel of Figure 1 the market-based leverage is much more volatile compared to the other accounting leverage ratios.…”
Section: Composition Of the Databasementioning
confidence: 95%
“…The downward trend in the first three panels of Figure 1 is more pronounced for risk-weighted capital ratios (the shaded area indicates the post-Lehman period). The fact that the risk-based leverage fell more strongly than the other leverage measures in response to the crisis suggests that banks could have invested in assets with lower risk weights, although there is evidence that banks from the advanced economies increased capital through equity issuance, cuts in dividends and increases in retained earnings (Cohen and Scatigna, 2014). As one can see from the last panel of Figure 1 the market-based leverage is much more volatile compared to the other accounting leverage ratios.…”
Section: Composition Of the Databasementioning
confidence: 95%
“…The reform program has been successful in strengthening the financial system and supporting financial stability. And there is evidence suggesting that a well-capitalized banking system supports sustainable credit growth (Cohen and Scatigna 2014). It is nonetheless important that authorities carefully evaluate the impact of the substantial changes in financial regulation in response to the crisis, and stand ready to amend policies if major adverse unintended consequences are revealed.…”
Section: Implementation and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to investigate whether such over‐compliance with the (not yet mandatory) 3 per cent threshold might have affected monetary policy implementation, we start by measuring the relative contribution of capital and exposures to changes in the LR. We decompose changes in each bank's LR according to the following formula that adapts the one presented in Cohen and Scatigna (): LnormalR1LnormalR0=K1TnormalE1K0TnormalE0=C·logtrue(1+ΔKK0true)C·logtrue(1+ΔTETnormalE0true) where C=true(K1TnormalE1K0TnormalE0true)/true(logK1TnormalE1logK0TnormalE0true), K and TE denote Tier 1 capital and total exposure respectively.…”
Section: Compliance In 2013–2016mentioning
confidence: 99%