2017
DOI: 10.1093/jsh/shx063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bankrupts and Usurers of Imperial Russia: Debt, Property, and the Law in the Age of Dostoevsky and Tolstoy. By Sergei Antonov

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The economic relationship between Jewish middlemen and the majority was based on repeated interactions: on a regular basis, creditors lent to peasants and grain traders extended credit both to peasants in rural areas and to urban buyers of grain. 5 As we discuss below, historians point out that in periods of bad economic shocks, it was common for creditors to forgive debt completely or to roll it over for the next period (Antonov, 2016). The reason why creditors were ready to forgive debt was the value of continuation of their relationship with debtors.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The economic relationship between Jewish middlemen and the majority was based on repeated interactions: on a regular basis, creditors lent to peasants and grain traders extended credit both to peasants in rural areas and to urban buyers of grain. 5 As we discuss below, historians point out that in periods of bad economic shocks, it was common for creditors to forgive debt completely or to roll it over for the next period (Antonov, 2016). The reason why creditors were ready to forgive debt was the value of continuation of their relationship with debtors.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…6. Note that credit contracts were relatively well enforced in the Russian Empire before the collapse of the state in 1917 (Antonov, 2016).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…70 Because tsarist Russia had a regime of separate marital property, husbands and wives could choose who would be a legal property owner or who would take on a debt; considerations of debt may well have been behind the decision for Anastasiia to be the legal owner of the factory at this point. 71 The Chikins seem to have been doing very well at the time they entered the Gatchina merchant society. Their daughter, Elizaveta, was born around the time they became legal owners of the factory.…”
Section: IIImentioning
confidence: 99%