2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.bir.2017.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bank loan loss provisions research: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
136
0
5

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(162 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
3
136
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies show that banks can use discretionary loan loss provisions to smooth income, to manage capital levels or to signal information about firm's earnings prospects (see, Scholes et al, 1990;Kanagaretnam et al, 2005;Leventis et al, 2012;Curcio and Hasan, 2015;Ozili, 2018, etc. ), implying that reported loan loss provisions estimate is not solely driven by credit risk considerations but by other considerations (see, Ozili and Outa, 2017). We extend this observation in the literature to the case of intangible assets to detect whether the level of discretionary provisions is also influenced by intangible asset investment risks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Studies show that banks can use discretionary loan loss provisions to smooth income, to manage capital levels or to signal information about firm's earnings prospects (see, Scholes et al, 1990;Kanagaretnam et al, 2005;Leventis et al, 2012;Curcio and Hasan, 2015;Ozili, 2018, etc. ), implying that reported loan loss provisions estimate is not solely driven by credit risk considerations but by other considerations (see, Ozili and Outa, 2017). We extend this observation in the literature to the case of intangible assets to detect whether the level of discretionary provisions is also influenced by intangible asset investment risks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Some studies show that banks use loan loss provisions estimate as a tool to signal information about banks' future prospect (Ozili and Outa, 2017). For instance, Beaver et al (1989) investigate US banks and find that loan loss provisions are correlated with bank market values indicating that loan loss provisions are used to signal bank's financial strength.…”
Section: Loan Loss Provisions: Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rủi ro tín dụng kì vọng là tổn thất tín dụng trung bình được kì vọng từ mức độ rủi ro của danh mục đầu tư trong một khoảng thời gian nhất định. Theo Ozili và Outa [11], khi ngân hàng phát sinh rủi ro tín dụng, ngân hàng sẽ trích lập dự phòng từ dòng tiền lợi nhuận để dự kiến khoản tiền sẽ mất. Ngược lại, rủi ro tín dụng không kì vọng là các khoản thất thoát tín dụng bất ngờ mà tổng tổn thất trung bình vượt quá mức thất thoát trung bình.…”
Section: Tổng Quan Nghiên Cứuunclassified
“…Theo cách tiếp cận của Acharya [7], rủi ro tín dụng sẽ được đo lường bằng độ lệch chuẩn của dư nợ xấu (STDNPL -The standard deviation of non-performing loan ratio). Bên cạnh đó, để gia tăng mức độ tin cậy của nghiên cứu, nhóm tác giả kiểm định thêm thang đo rủi ro tín dụng là tỉ số dự phòng rủi ro tín dụng trên tổng dư nợ LLP theo cách tiếp cận của Ozili and Outa [11].…”
Section: A đO Lường Rủi Ro Tín Dụngunclassified
“…, Berger e Bouwman (2013),Silva et al (2014),Cummings e Durrani (2016),Hamadi et al (2016),Macedo e Kelly (2016),Morris et al (2016) Curcio et al (2017),Nez et al (2017),Ozili e Outa (2017),Caporale et al (2018),Elnahass et al (2018),Maso et al (2018),Aristei e Gallo (2019) REC IndependenteVariávelDummy com valor 1 se o ano foi de recessão e 0 se não El Sood (2012), Flores (2012), Berger e Bouwman (2013), Silva et al (2014), Cohen et al (2014), Curcio et al (2017), Menezes Junior (2017), Ozili e Outa (2017), Caporale et al (2018), Elnahass et al (2018) EBTPxREC Independente Variável de interação entre o lucro e a recessão El Sood (2012), Berger e Bouwman (2013), Curcio et al (2017), Ozili e Outa (2017), Caporale et al (2018), IFRS9 Independente Variável Dummy com valor 1 para 2018 e 0 para 2017 Hamadi et al (2016) para Basileia II EBTPxIFRS9 Independente Variável de interação entre o lucro e o IFRS9 Hamadi et al (2016) para Basileia II LOANS Controle Empréstimos totais em relação ao ativo totalKanagaretnam et al (2010), Hamadi et al (2016), Morris et al (2016), Curcio et al (2017), Marton e Runesson (2017), Ozili e Outa (2017), Caporale et al (2018), Maso et al (2018), Aristei e Gallo (2019), Riahi (2019) LOANS Controle Variação entre dois períodos dos empréstimos totais dividido pelo total do ano Kanagaretnam et al (2010), El Sood (2012), Berger e Bouwman (2013), Cohen et al (2014), Hamadi et al (2016), Macedo e Kelly (2016), Morris et al (2016), Menezes Junior (2017), Ozili e Outa (2017), Elnahass et al (2018), Maso et al (2018), Aristei e Gallo (2019(2016), Hamadi et al (2016), Morris et al (2016), Curcio et al (2017), Marton e Runesson (2017), Ozili e Outa (2017), Caporale et al (2018), Maso et al (2018), Aristei e Gallo (2019), Riahi (. (2010), El Sood (2012), Beck and Narayanmoorth (2013), Berger e Bouwman (2013), Silva et al (2014), Cohen et al (2014), Hamadi et al (2016), Curcio et al (2017), Marton e Runesson (2017), Menezes Junior (2017), Ozili e Outa (2017), Caporale et al (2018), Elnahass et al (2018), Maso et al (2018), períodos do PIB, dividido pelo total do ano Kanagaretnam et al (2010), Cummings e Durrani (2016), Hamadi et al (2016), Curcio et al (2017), Marton e Runesson (2017), Ozili e Outa (2017), Caporale et al (2018), Elnahass et al (2018), Aristei e Gallo (2019), Riahi (2019) Fonte: Elaboração própria (2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%