2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfs.2017.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bank lending and systemic risk: A financial-real sector network approach with feedback

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The result is a customer experience that encourages better engagement 2 Complexity and reduces churn. Bank lending and systemic risk [28,29] is another issue in economics sector that attracted a lot of attention. This model will find empirical evidence against diversification as a mean to reduce systemic risk.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The result is a customer experience that encourages better engagement 2 Complexity and reduces churn. Bank lending and systemic risk [28,29] is another issue in economics sector that attracted a lot of attention. This model will find empirical evidence against diversification as a mean to reduce systemic risk.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Financial systems, being complex networks in their nature, evolve continuously and their features undergo a neverending process of substantial changes (see, e.g., Tabak et al [1]). There is a vast body of recent literatures on systemic financial risk arising from interconnectedness of institutions, targeting financial systems' stability (see, e.g., Aymann et al [2]; Souza et al [3]; Silva et al [4]). One of the important domains analyzed in literature is the case of financial networks primarily linked through different types of credit contracts, portfolio contagion, or credit guarantees, (see, e.g., Li and Wen [5], Anagnostou et al [6], and Jiang and Fan [7]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few papers have used financial institution level, network-based proxies for systemic risk (Thurner and Poledna (2013)), because it is very hard to acquire this granular level of data. The benefit of doing so, which at the same time is limitation of other non-network-based proxies (Blanco et al, 2018;Silva et al, 2018;Kanno, 2016), is that the DebtRank account for the contagion between financial institutions. 12…”
Section: Effects On Banks and Systemic Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%