2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0165-1765(01)00427-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bank–firm relationships, financing and firm performance in Germany

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
59
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
59
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…board representation) also seem to have higher survival rates (Elston 2004). Conversely, Agarwal and Elston (2001) and Chirinko and Elston (1998) do no find statistically significant differences between the profitability of bank-and non-bank controlled firms. In fact, firms whose ultimate owner is a bank or another financial institution appear to have lower productivity growth (Januszewski et al 2002).…”
Section: Monitoring By Blockholdersmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…board representation) also seem to have higher survival rates (Elston 2004). Conversely, Agarwal and Elston (2001) and Chirinko and Elston (1998) do no find statistically significant differences between the profitability of bank-and non-bank controlled firms. In fact, firms whose ultimate owner is a bank or another financial institution appear to have lower productivity growth (Januszewski et al 2002).…”
Section: Monitoring By Blockholdersmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Lehmann and Neuberger (2001) and Edwards and Fischer (1994) also document that banks intervene in case their corporate client runs into financial distress. Hopwever, Agarwal and Elston (2001) are not convinced about the firms benefit from increased access to capital, as their interest payments to debt ratio is also significantly higher. This suggests that German banks engage in rent-seeking activities.…”
Section: Creditor Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As relational banks hold most of their borrowing firms' debt, they may prefer to avoid financing risky long-term investment projects, even if profitable, or decide to protect the firm management against profitable but risky hostile takeovers (Weinstein and Yafeh 1998;Chirinko and Elston 2006). In addition, in order to reduce negative externalities on other borrowers or to open up new business opportunities to them, relational banks might find it profitable to reveal private information about the firm's growth projects for which they are the main lender, thus dissipating the firm's crucial competitive advantages (Agarwal and Elston 2001). The importance of both these effects can be reasonably thought to increase with the size of borrowing, going so far as to overwhelm the information effect for large firms only.…”
Section: Why Should Main Banks Influence the Growth Of Borrowing Firms?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weinstein and Yafeh (1998) and Miarka (1999) extend the analysis to a large sample of small and large Japanese enterprises in the periods 1977-1986 and 1985-1998, respectively, once again clearly rejecting the hypothesis that main bank clients grow more rapidly than other firms. Agarwal and Elston (2001) analyze the annual growth rate of sales for a sample of 100 large enterprises in Germany in the period [1970][1971][1972][1973][1974][1975][1976][1977][1978][1979][1980][1981][1982][1983][1984][1985][1986]. Even after wiping out the influence of unobserved individual fixed effects, their regression results indicate that close bank-firm relationships are not significantly associated with faster growth rates of firms (see also Elston 2002) 1 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the information is not fully available in financial markets. Through embedded ties, a commercial bank can access and accumulate the customer-specific information from past transaction experiences (Uzzi, 1999;Yasuda, 2005), through continuous monitoring process (Agarwal & Elston, 2001;Gorton & Schmid, 2000;Macey, 2000) or through friendship and family relationships (Hamilton, 1997;Peng & Luo, 2000;Yeung, 2006). In this manner, the commercial bank is able to pay less costs to investigate the credit of a customer and can therefore provide cheaper loan service.…”
Section: Social Capital To Mitigate Market Imperfectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%