1996
DOI: 10.26509/frbc-wp-199604
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bank Deposit Rate Clustering : Theory and Empirical Evidence

Abstract: Like security prices, retail deposit interest rates cluster around integers and "even" fractions. However, explanations for security price clustering are incompatible with deposit rate clustering. A theory based on the limited recall of retail depositors is proposed. It predicts that banks tend to set rates at integers and that rates are "sticky" at these levels. The propensity for integer rates increases with the level of wholesale interest rates and deposit market concentration. When banks set noninteger rat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Christie and Schultz (1994a, b) propose the collusion hypothesis and present evidence that Nasdaq dealers avoid odd-eighth quotes to maintain wide spreads. Kahn et al (1999) observe that retail customers tend to underestimate odd-ending prices when recalling them and suggest a limitedrecall hypothesis to explain the more frequent even-ending yields in bank deposits. Booth et al (2000) examine the relation between internal/preference trading and price clustering, noticing that an internal market is more prone to price manipulation or collusion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Christie and Schultz (1994a, b) propose the collusion hypothesis and present evidence that Nasdaq dealers avoid odd-eighth quotes to maintain wide spreads. Kahn et al (1999) observe that retail customers tend to underestimate odd-ending prices when recalling them and suggest a limitedrecall hypothesis to explain the more frequent even-ending yields in bank deposits. Booth et al (2000) examine the relation between internal/preference trading and price clustering, noticing that an internal market is more prone to price manipulation or collusion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Competition among liquidity suppliers is intense, making collusion on quoted prices practically impossible. Our research makes an important ARTICLE IN PRESS 1 A partial list of recent studies include Ball et al (1985), Harris (1991), Goodhart and Curcio (1991), Colwell et al (1994), Grossman et al (1997), Gwilym et al (1998), Kahn et al (1999), Peltzman (2000), Sopranzetti and Datar (2002), Brown et al (2002), Jones and Lamont (2002), Jones (2003). 2 While Goodhart and Curcio (1991) examine the attraction hypothesis in price clustering in financial markets for the first time, there is a well-established consumer research literature that attributes rounding to human cognitive accessibility (Tversky and Kahneman, 1973;Higgins et al, 1977;Fazio et al, 1982). contribution to the literature for the following reasons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…It has been explored to only a limited degree in currency markets (Goodhart and Curcio, 1991;De Grauwe and Decupere, 1992;Grossman et al, 1997 and more recently Sopranzetti and Datar, 2002). Clustering is further documented in derivatives, i.e., options and futures markets and bonds (Gwilym et al, 1998a,b) as well as in commodity markets (Ball et al, 1985;Grossman et al, 1997), bank deposit rates (Kahn et al, 1999) initial public-offer auction bids (Kandel et al, 2001) and other price setting processes. 2 This renewed interest in recent periods is in part driven by a need to understand this clustering phenomenon.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…4 Many articles in the commercial banking literature use distinct interest rate elasticities to characterize the provision of demand and time deposit funds. See Berger and Hannan (1998), Kahn et al (1999), and Sharpe (1997) for example. Others empirically establish different interest rate sensitivities for the two accounts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%