r 2000
DOI: 10.20955/r.82.29-42
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bank Competition and Concentration: Do Credit Unions Matter?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, few analyses of U.S. banking markets consider the role of credit unions as potential competitors of banks. Emmons and Schmid (2000) find that credit union participation rates are higher in more concentrated local deposit markets. They also find that concentration in deposit markets increases if a county records an increase in the credit union participation rate during the previous year.…”
Section: Banks and Credit Unions As Competitorsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…However, few analyses of U.S. banking markets consider the role of credit unions as potential competitors of banks. Emmons and Schmid (2000) find that credit union participation rates are higher in more concentrated local deposit markets. They also find that concentration in deposit markets increases if a county records an increase in the credit union participation rate during the previous year.…”
Section: Banks and Credit Unions As Competitorsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…19 See for overviews of the various legislative changes for example Cetorelli (2001), Clarke (2004) andFitch Ratings (2005). Emmons and Schmid (2000) find evidence that even before most of this new legislation was enacted, banks and credit unions competed directly.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, it extends the sample of monopoly/duopoly banking markets that have been studied in the literature from two to six, potentially shedding some modest light on the extent to which previous findings may or may not be more broadly representative of other highly concentrated banking markets. Second, the strength of competition between banks and thrifts is an important but debated policy question (see for instance Cooperman, Lee, & Lesage, 1990;Hannan & Liang, 1995;Emmons & Schmid, 2000), to which this study adds new evidence. Third, the sample of banks facing one savings institution but no other banks might be expected to behave in ways intermediate between a pure monopoly bank and a pure duopoly bank, and comparison of our results with those of Shaffer and DiSalvo (1994) and Shaffer (2002a) can ascertain the validity of that expectation.…”
Section: Sample Method and Datamentioning
confidence: 92%