2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11156-018-0750-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bank capital structure, capital requirements and SRISK across bank ownership types and financial crisis: panel VAR approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, a vast majority of the studies reviewed used the equity to assets ratio as a measure of capitalization and ignored the relationship between the profitability of banks and their regulatory capital ratios, i.e., their capital to risk-weighted assets ratio and minimum capital requirements. Some studies, however, did use the capital to risk-weighted assets ratio as a measure of capitalization but in a different context (see for example Belaid et al 2017;Konara et al 2019;Jouida 2018). This study is the first to employ the equity to assets ratio, capital to risk-weighted assets ratio, and minimum capital requirements as measures of capitalization to provide better insight and offer more profound implications.…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further, a vast majority of the studies reviewed used the equity to assets ratio as a measure of capitalization and ignored the relationship between the profitability of banks and their regulatory capital ratios, i.e., their capital to risk-weighted assets ratio and minimum capital requirements. Some studies, however, did use the capital to risk-weighted assets ratio as a measure of capitalization but in a different context (see for example Belaid et al 2017;Konara et al 2019;Jouida 2018). This study is the first to employ the equity to assets ratio, capital to risk-weighted assets ratio, and minimum capital requirements as measures of capitalization to provide better insight and offer more profound implications.…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study employs three measure of capitalization: the Capital Ratio (CR), as a measure of total equity to total assets (Haris et al 2019c;Athanasoglou et al 2008;Saona 2016;Tan 2016;; the Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR), as a measure of regulatory capital to total risk-weighted assets (Belaid et al 2017;Jouida 2018;Konara et al 2019;; and the Minimum Capital Requirement (MCR). The CR has been extensively studied in the vast body of literature, while the CAR and MCR are regulatory concerns 3 based on the BASEL guidelines developed to measure and strengthen the capital position of banks and other financial institutions.…”
Section: Independent Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our paper, we investigate the impact of AC characteristics on the quality and quantity of forward-looking disclosure (FLD) in the chairman statement. The corporate board of directors (BODs) and its committees, such as AC, are relevant CG mechanisms that oversee managerial actions (Fama and Jensen 1983;Blue Ribbon Report 1999;Smith Report 2003;Lu and Boateng 2018;Jouida 2019). AC members have great control over the information to be disclosed in annual reports to protect shareholders' interests (Li et al 2008;Haji 2015;Abad and Bravo 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A weak system of governance tends to offer substantial managerial opportunities to engage in risk-taking activities and fraudulent acts. Extant literature (e.g., Mallette and Fowler 1992;Faleye et al 2018;Lu and Boateng 2017;Jouida 2019) documents that an effective board of directors can monitor top 1 3 management on behalf of shareholders to reduce information asymmetry between managers and shareholders and thereby lessen agency costs. Resource dependence theorists assert that a board of directors is "a provider of resources, such as legitimacy, advice and council links to other organizations" (Hillman and Dalziel 2003, p. 383).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%