1991
DOI: 10.1049/ip-i-2.1991.0023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bandwidth efficient QAM schemes for Rayleigh fading channels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
106
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 150 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
106
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the differential encoding applied to the ring-amplitudes in (31) is the same as in classic DAPSK [3]- [5], which is given by Γ n = γ n−1 Γ n−1 . The L A -level transmitted ring-amplitude and data-carrying ringamplitude are given by Γ n = α µn √ β and γ n−1 = αǎ, respectively.…”
Section: A Differential and Absolute Amplitude Encodingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, the differential encoding applied to the ring-amplitudes in (31) is the same as in classic DAPSK [3]- [5], which is given by Γ n = γ n−1 Γ n−1 . The L A -level transmitted ring-amplitude and data-carrying ringamplitude are given by Γ n = α µn √ β and γ n−1 = αǎ, respectively.…”
Section: A Differential and Absolute Amplitude Encodingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proposition 5: An optimized diversity product for a DSTM scheme using PSK also results in an optimized diversity product 3 for its star QAM counterpart of DSTM using DASK/ASK.…”
Section: B Maximum-likelihood Differential Detection (Ml-dd)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For this reason, typically Star QAM constellations are preferred for DQAM design. Furthermore, the classic Differential Amplitude Phase Shift Keying (DAPSK) was proposed by Webb et al [4] in 1991, where differential encoding was invoked for both the Star QAM ring-amplitude and phase. In 2000, Fischer et al [2] carried out the capacity comparison of ADPSK, of DAPSK and of their twisted-constellationbased counterparts both in AWGN channels and in quasi-static fading channels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance of the CDD aided DAPSK was compared to that of the coherent QAM in [5]- [7], where the DAPSK was shown to be particularly advantageous, when its coherent QAM counterpart suffered from a realistic channel estimation error. However, it was observed in [4] that the performance of CDD aided DAPSK degrades and eventually an error floor is formed in Rayleigh fading channels, when the Doppler frequency is increased. In order to further improve the CDD's performance, the classic Decision-Feedback Differential Detection (DFDD) that was originally proposed for DPSK in [8], [9] was further developed for DAPSK in [10]- [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%