2016
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.6b07768
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bandgap and Structure Engineering via Cation Exchange: From Binary Ag2S to Ternary AgInS2, Quaternary AgZnInS alloy and AgZnInS/ZnS Core/Shell Fluorescent Nanocrystals for Bioimaging

Abstract: Attention on semiconductor nanocrystals have been largely focused because of their unique optical and electrical properties, which can be applied as light absorber and luminophore. However, the band gap and structure engineering of nanomaterials is not so easy because of their finite size. Here we demonstrate an approach for preparing ternary AgInS2 (AIS), quaternary AgZnInS (AZIS), AgInS2/ZnS and AgZnInS/ZnS nanocompounds based on cation exchange. First, pristine Ag2S quantum dots (QDs) with different sizes w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
86
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
10
86
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Ag 3d peak is split into 3d 5/2 (368.03 eV) and 3d 3/2 (374.04 eV) peaks, the In 3d peak is split into 3d 5/2 (444.53 eV) and 3d 3/2 (452.1 eV) peaks, and the peaks at 161.55 and 162.82 eV correspond to S 2p transitions. These observed binding energies are in agreement with reported data for AgInS 2 NCs . Thus, these XPS results confirm the formation of stoichiometric AgInS 2 NCs, which is in agreement with the results of PXRD and HRTEM analyses.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Ag 3d peak is split into 3d 5/2 (368.03 eV) and 3d 3/2 (374.04 eV) peaks, the In 3d peak is split into 3d 5/2 (444.53 eV) and 3d 3/2 (452.1 eV) peaks, and the peaks at 161.55 and 162.82 eV correspond to S 2p transitions. These observed binding energies are in agreement with reported data for AgInS 2 NCs . Thus, these XPS results confirm the formation of stoichiometric AgInS 2 NCs, which is in agreement with the results of PXRD and HRTEM analyses.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…These observed binding energies are in agreement with reportedd ata for AgInS 2 NCs. [35,36] Thus, these XPS results confirm the formation of stoichiometricA gInS 2 NCs, which is in agreement with the resultso fP XRD and HRTEM analyses.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The expected redshift is usually explained by the leakage of excitons from the core into the shell, whose bandgap is essentially smaller than the HOMO-LUMO gap of insulating organic ligands on its surface 20 . The blueshift, in contrast, is often explained as the result of changes in surface defect levels by surface passivation with ZnS and/ or the result of partial alloying by cation exchange from copper and indium into zinc [21][22][23] . In our experiments, we also observed a blueshift in PL when AgInS 2 NPs were reacted with zinc acetate (Zn(OAc) 2 ) and elemental sulfur at 200°C, as shown in the optical spectra in Fig.…”
Section: Choice Of Shell Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The blueshift of band‐edge emission (Figure B) is further evidence of Zn incorporation. It has been reported that the reason for this blueshift is due to the decrease in the size of CdSe QDs as the surface of CdSe QDs transform to Cd 1−x Zn x Se with the progress of cation exchange …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%