2010
DOI: 10.1039/c0cc00899k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Band-gap tunable (Cu2Sn)x/3Zn1−xS nanoparticles for solar cells

Abstract: Sphalerite-type (Cu(2)Sn)(x/3)Zn(1-x)S (0 < or = x < or = 0.75) nanocrystals with tunable band gaps were successfully prepared via a solvothermal approach. Band gaps of the nanoparticles could be adjusted from 3.48 eV to 1.23 eV by changing the composition. Their implementation in quantum dot sensitized solar cells (QDSSCs) suggests considerable potential in solar cells.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
79
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
4
79
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4(a) shows the Cu 2p XPS spectra of all sulfurized samples. There are two peaks located at 952.17 and 932.95 eV, with 19.84-eV peak separations, indicating the formation of Cu + for all sulfurized samples [27,28]. On the other hand, the peak observed at 932.25 eV is attributed to the Cu 2-X S phase for the CZTS 0.02 sample (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4(a) shows the Cu 2p XPS spectra of all sulfurized samples. There are two peaks located at 952.17 and 932.95 eV, with 19.84-eV peak separations, indicating the formation of Cu + for all sulfurized samples [27,28]. On the other hand, the peak observed at 932.25 eV is attributed to the Cu 2-X S phase for the CZTS 0.02 sample (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…4(b) suggest the presence of Zn 2+ for all sulfurized samples [27,28]. The Sn 3d core peaks at 494.65 and 486.35 eV can be attributed to Sn 4+ [27,28] (Fig. 4(c)).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…4b, the Cu 2p core level spectrum exhibits two peaks at approximately 932.5 eV and 952.5 eV, which are assigned to 2p 3/2 and 2p 1/2 core levels of Cu 1+ , respectively. [21][22][23] Additionally, the "shake-up" satellites at approximately 945 eV and 965 eV for the Cu 2p 3/2 and 2p 1/2 core levels, respectively, are associated with the existence of Cu 2+ . 19,27 The XRD, TGA, and XPS results demonstrate the occurrence of chemical bonds between Cu and S in the electrode with Cu as the current collector, which indicates that the S is not only physically loaded on the Cu current collector but also chemically interacts with the Cu substrate by forming of copper sulfides with the mixed valence states of Cu 1+ and Cu 2+ ions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is consistent with the 160-164 eV range expected for S in sulfide phases. [21][22][23] It is reported that the monolayer of S enhances surface self-diffusion on Cu (111) by several orders of magnitude. 24 Cu n S m clusters form more readily on Cu (111) when compared to a Cu adatom and diffuse easily during the adsorption of sulfur on Cu (111).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4. A linear background subtraction is performed on the raw data, and the peaks are fitted using The data is extracted from EDS spectra [32]. These XPS results are also consistent to our previous results [26].…”
Section: Phase Identificationmentioning
confidence: 68%