2010
DOI: 10.1063/1.3442917
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Band gap of sphalerite and chalcopyrite phases of epitaxial ZnSnP2

Abstract: Using contactless electroreflectance, we determined the band gap of the two known phases of epitaxial ZnSnP2. Induced by small changes in Sn/Zn flux ratio during epitaxy, the order-disordered transition between the chalcopyrite and sphalerite phases reduces the band gap by 300 meV. The chalcopyrite ordered phase, unambiguously identified from x-ray diffraction, exhibits a band gap of 1.683 eV at 293 K. The band gap of the disordered sphalerite phase is 1.383 eV. Using the volume-averaged order parameter measur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

9
22
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
9
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pattern at the bottom is the simulated orthorhombic pattern for the space group P na2 1 using the lattice parameters found for growth experiment 4 in Table 2 peaks, and the wurtzite phase was constrained to have the same lattice parameter and peak width as the disordered material of growth experiment 1. Researchers studying ZnSnP 2 also found evidence of phase separation of the ordered chalcopyrite and disordered sphalerite structures [3]. Growth experiments 3 and 4 were each fit well by the single orthorhombic P na2 1 phase.…”
Section: Characterization Methodsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The pattern at the bottom is the simulated orthorhombic pattern for the space group P na2 1 using the lattice parameters found for growth experiment 4 in Table 2 peaks, and the wurtzite phase was constrained to have the same lattice parameter and peak width as the disordered material of growth experiment 1. Researchers studying ZnSnP 2 also found evidence of phase separation of the ordered chalcopyrite and disordered sphalerite structures [3]. Growth experiments 3 and 4 were each fit well by the single orthorhombic P na2 1 phase.…”
Section: Characterization Methodsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…4 How ever, comparatively little attention has been focused on the II-IV-V 2 (II ¼ Zn, Cd; IV ¼ Si, Ge, Sn, and V ¼ N, P, As, or Sb) chalcopyrite structured materials, which offer additional chemical flexibility. ZnSnP 2 , which crystallizes in the chal copyrite structure, has been reported to possess a bandgap of 1.68 eV, 5 which is close to the optimum bandgap of 1.5 eV for a single-junction solar cell.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…6 In SP-ZSP, the Sn and Zn atoms are randomly dis tributed over the cation sub-lattice, and the disordered phase has been reported to exhibit a bandgap ranging from 1.22 eV to 1.38 eV. 5,7 The phenomenon of tunable disorder is well known for semiconductor alloys. 8 Unusually for a chalcopyrite structured material, ZnSnP 2 does not display any tetragonal distortion (i.e., c ¼ 2a), and so the lattice constant for both the chaclopyr ite and cubic sphalerite systems is nearly perfectly matched.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies using other methods yield data that conflict with the random disorder model. For example, band-gap measurements of ZnSnP 2 show decreases of 18% and 22% when comparing ordered samples with disordered (Ryan et al, 1987;St-Jean et al, 2010). DFT calculations based on the random model predict much larger decreases in band gap for the two cases of 56% and 76% (Scanlon & Walsh, 2012;Ma et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%