2003
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0834959100
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Band 3 is a host receptor binding merozoite surface protein 1 during thePlasmodium falciparuminvasion of erythrocytes

Abstract: We report the molecular identification of a sialic acid-independent host–parasite interaction in the Plasmodium falciparum malaria parasite invasion of RBCs. Two nonglycosylated exofacial regions of human band 3 in the RBC membrane were identified as a crucial host receptor binding the C-terminal processing products of merozoite surface protein 1 (MSP1). Peptides derived from the receptor region of band 3 inhibited the invasion of RBCs by P. falciparum. A major segment of the band 3 receptor (5ABC) bound to na… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
211
1
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 193 publications
(221 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
6
211
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This is an appealing notion, given the known involvement of EGF-like modules in many protein-protein interactions, but there is little supporting evidence for it. As mentioned above, there are indications that the C-terminal part of MSP1 binds directly or indirectly to host cell receptors at invasion (Goel et al, 2003;Li et al, 2004), but no hint that this requires -or is enhanced by -secondary processing. Furthermore, recent work by Crabb and colleagues showing that the P. falciparum and Plasmodium chabaudi MSP-1 19 domains can be replaced by even highly divergent sequences without any detrimental effect on parasite replication argues for a predominantly structural role for MSP-1 19 (O'Donnell et al, 2000;Drew et al, 2004).…”
Section: Why Shed?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is an appealing notion, given the known involvement of EGF-like modules in many protein-protein interactions, but there is little supporting evidence for it. As mentioned above, there are indications that the C-terminal part of MSP1 binds directly or indirectly to host cell receptors at invasion (Goel et al, 2003;Li et al, 2004), but no hint that this requires -or is enhanced by -secondary processing. Furthermore, recent work by Crabb and colleagues showing that the P. falciparum and Plasmodium chabaudi MSP-1 19 domains can be replaced by even highly divergent sequences without any detrimental effect on parasite replication argues for a predominantly structural role for MSP-1 19 (O'Donnell et al, 2000;Drew et al, 2004).…”
Section: Why Shed?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1B) whereas capping is observed for apical invasion proteins. Shaving occurs continuously as the parasite penetrates and is (Dubremetz et al ., 1985;Grimwood and Smith, 1995) Yes (Mineo and Kasper, 1994;He et al ., 2002) Unknown TgMIC1/MIC4/MIC6 (Meissner et al ., 2002b) Yes (Fourmaux et al ., 1996;Brecht et al ., 2001) MPP1 TgMIC2/M2AP Yes (Carruthers et al ., 1999;Harper et al ., 2004) MPP1 Zhou et al ., 2004) TgMIC3/MIC8 (Meissner et al ., 2002b) Yes (Garcia-Reguet et al ., 2000;Meissner et al ., 2002b) MPP1 TgAMA1 (Donahue et al ., 2000;Hehl et al ., 2000) Unknown MPP1 (S. A. Howell, M. J. Blackman and V. B. Carruthers, unpublished) Plasmodium PfTRAP and PbTRAP (Bhanot et al, 2003;Silvie et al ., 2004) Yes (McCormick et al ., 1999;Akhouri et al ., 2004) Serine protease (Silvie et al .. 2004) PfCSP (Stewart and Vanderberg, 1988; Yes (Pinzon-Ortiz et al ., 2001) Unknown PfMSP1/MSP6/MSP7 (Stafford et al ., 1994) Yes (Goel et al ., 2003;Li et al ., 2004) MESH (Howell et al ., 2003) PkAMA1 and PfAMA1 (Deans et al ., 1984;Howell et al ., 2001) Yes (Fraser et al ., 2001) MESH (Howell et al ., 2003) EBL-DBP (Camus and Hadley, 1985;Haynes et al ., 1988) Yes (Camus and Hadley, 1985;Haynes et al ., 1988) Unknown Py235 (Ogun and Holder, 1996) Yes (Ogun and Holde...…”
Section: Primed For Penetrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Initial attachment is thought to involve antigens on the surface of merozoites, such as merozoite surface protein-1 (MSP1) and other GPI-anchored surface proteins (8,9), and is followed by apical reorientation of the merozoite involving apical membrane antigen 1 (AMA1) (10). Secondary interactions are then required for activation of invasion processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In P. falciparum, PfMSP1 interacts with other MSPs, PfMSP6 and -7, forming a complex on the merozoite surface (46 -48). PfSUB1 matures the three components of this complex (21), which remains associated at the surface of the merozoite and is critical for merozoite invasion, probably via a merozoite-erythrocyte attachment step, prior to parasite reorientation and internalization inside the host cell (23,49,50). More work is needed to unravel the complex basis of merozoite attachment to the erythrocyte and protein maturation events involved in the process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%