2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2018.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Banach Contraction Principle and ruin probabilities in regime-switching models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Proposition 2.1 and Theorem 2.2 below give upper bounds for d(p τ , p τ ). The relevant results on stability (continuity) of the infinite horizon ruin probability can be found, for instance, in [13,17] for the Cramer-Lundberg risk process, and for more general risk model in [2,3,9,10]. On the other hand, we are not aware of any continuity inequalities for densities of ruin time.…”
Section: Theorem 22 and The Results Of Section 3 Imply That Under Somentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proposition 2.1 and Theorem 2.2 below give upper bounds for d(p τ , p τ ). The relevant results on stability (continuity) of the infinite horizon ruin probability can be found, for instance, in [13,17] for the Cramer-Lundberg risk process, and for more general risk model in [2,3,9,10]. On the other hand, we are not aware of any continuity inequalities for densities of ruin time.…”
Section: Theorem 22 and The Results Of Section 3 Imply That Under Somentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lower and upper estimates for the vector of finite-horizon as well as ultimate deficit distributions at ruin has been proven in Gajek and Rudź (2018c). The generality of the regime-switching Sparre Andersen model allows an immediate application of the above mentioned methods in several continuous and discrete time risk models listed in Gajek and Rudź (2018a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other references can be found, e.g., in Silvestrov (2014Silvestrov ( , 2015. For a discussion of recent developments of Markov switching models and the operator approach in ruin theory, we also refer the reader to Gajek and Rudź (2018a). In particular, a research methodology based on Banach Contraction Principle is used there to approximate a vector of ultimate ruin probabilities in a regime-switching Sparre Andersen model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regime-switching models have received considerable attention recently, see, e.g. Q. Liu et al [20], Jacka and Ocejo [15], Momeya [22], Xu et al [28], R.H. Liu [19], G. Wang et al [27], Landriault et al [18], Chen et al [4], Guillou et al [13], Lu [21], Asmussen [1], Gajek and Rudź [9][10][11][12] and the references therein for an overview of selected developments and applications of Markov-modulated models and related problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…hold for any n ∈ N (see Theorem 3.6 for details). Moreover, for any i ∈ S, the sequences {D i n } n∈N and {U i n } n∈N converge monotonically, as n → ∞, to i with the exponential rate of convergence: A distinct mathematical methodology for obtaining the unique fixed point of the risk operator, based on Banach Contraction Principle, can be found in Gajek and Rudź [10]. Some stochastic developments of Banach-type fixed point theorems are discussed in Saipara et al [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%