2019
DOI: 10.1002/ygh2.340
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Balloon‐occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration versus endoscopic injection for gastric variceal bleeding: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

Abstract: Summary Background and Aims Bleeding from gastric varices presents a clinical challenge with high mortality and limited treatment options. Balloon‐occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration and endoscopic injection therapy have been used in the management of gastric varices. We performed a meta‐analysis comparing the two approaches. Methods A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Scopus was performed until February 20… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
(89 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From an IR perspective, BRTO is an effective treatment modality for bleeding GV. Compared with cyanoacrylate injection, BRTO is associated with lower odds of rebleeding and higher odds of complete GV obliteration according to a recent meta-analysis [ 27 ]. However, the large volume of instilled sclerosant during BRTO dissipates in the systemic circulation, potentially leading to profound systemic disturbances and deleterious adverse events.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From an IR perspective, BRTO is an effective treatment modality for bleeding GV. Compared with cyanoacrylate injection, BRTO is associated with lower odds of rebleeding and higher odds of complete GV obliteration according to a recent meta-analysis [ 27 ]. However, the large volume of instilled sclerosant during BRTO dissipates in the systemic circulation, potentially leading to profound systemic disturbances and deleterious adverse events.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%