2014 IEEE 30th International Conference on Data Engineering Workshops 2014
DOI: 10.1109/icdew.2014.6818335
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Balloon Fusion: SPARQL rewriting based on unified co-reference information

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the problems of co-reference between URIs, ontology mapping, etc. (Millard et al, 2010;Schlegel et al, 2014), widget linkage is currently supported only for datasets from the same endpoint. As a next step, we plan to address this limitation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the problems of co-reference between URIs, ontology mapping, etc. (Millard et al, 2010;Schlegel et al, 2014), widget linkage is currently supported only for datasets from the same endpoint. As a next step, we plan to address this limitation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SPARQL-based crawling of co-reference information allows Glaser et al [8] to create a co-reference resolution service. Following a similar approach, Schlegel et al [22] build an on-the-fly query rewriting service. Compared to these approaches, we focus on matching values in disparate data sources to their equivalent URIs without using special predicates like owl:sameAs, 23 http://code-research.eu/ 24 http://www.planet-data.eu/ skos:exactMatch, etc.…”
Section: Example Mashupsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For example, the EEA and the EC utilize different URIs to describe the same geographical entities (e.g., a country), but these URIs are not linked to each other or referred to a common URI. Attempts to deal with this issue through crawling owl:sameAs relationships in data sources exist [8,22], but this approach cannot detect equivalent entities if the data sources lack owl:sameAs relationships, which often is the case. Another approach is to manually provide owl:sameAs relationships to integrate data from heterogeneous data sources [12,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This work is similar in spirit to ours, but we advance over it by (i) using a bigger corpus, (ii) analyzing the owl:sameAs graph at the level of individual resources instead of datasets (a graph of over 500M owl:sameAs links), and most importantly, (iii) computing and publishing the closure of this massive graph. Also in 2014, Schlegel et al [14] queried 200 SPARQL endpoints to obtain 17.6M owl:sameAs links over 2.4M IRIs for which they did compute the transitive closure, obtaining 8.4M equivalence classes. The dataset and analysis we present in this paper is an order of magnitude larger.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%