Ballistic fingerprinting databases

Kinder, Jan De

doi:10.1016/s1355-0306(02)71829-7

Cited by 15 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…5. The ability to efficiently implement Primitive inference 2(b) (Section 3.2) (trace to the source) through databases for shoes [15] and guns [16] is complex mainly because of the legal difficulties and pragmatic constraints pertaining to the recording of an adequate and relevant reference collection. Overly restrictive legal rules for the recording of DNA profiles can also be an obstacle in the application of the same primitive inferences.…”

Section: Primitive Forensic Intelligence Inferences Within Their Contextmentioning

confidence: 99%

The contribution of forensic science to crime analysis and investigation: Forensic intelligence

Ribaux

Walsh

Margot

2006

Forensic Science International

113

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Primitive Forensic Intelligence Inferences Within Their Contextmentioning

confidence: 99%

The contribution of forensic science to crime analysis and investigation: Forensic intelligence

Ribaux

Walsh

Margot

2006

Forensic Science International

113

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Several difficulties regarding the use of such databases were identified in [1]. These difficulties have prevented most of the states in the United States from developing and using an RBID.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, two states, Maryland and New York, have implemented statewide ballistics imaging databases for new handguns sold in those states. Article [1] evaluates the current New York state legislation in light of forensic and practical needs.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reference ballistic imaging database performance

Kinder

Tulleners²,

Thiebaut

2004

Forensic Science International

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Results revealed system difficulty for matching breech face marks of twin test-fires from guns 1,3,5,6,7,8,9,11,13,15,and 16 (Refer to Fig. 7).…”

Section: Effectiveness Regarding Cartridge Casesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Influence Factors Regarding the Effectiveness of Automated Ballistic Comparison on 0.38 Special Caliber Bullets and Cartridge Cases

Santos

Muterlle

2018

Journal of Forensic Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Factors influencing effectiveness of automated comparisons, test-fired bullets, and cartridge cases from 0.38 Special revolvers were logged into the Evofinder Ballistic ID System. Tests were performed as follows: First test correlated test-fires of the same type, second test compared different types of ammunition components, third test replicated the second test in a larger database, and fourth test replicated the third test with students having no previous firearm identification experience. System effectiveness with projectiles in the first test was 0.89. With cartridge cases, effectiveness was 0.79 with combined results, but analysis of separate results by breech face and firing pin revealed low effectiveness by breech face (0.40). In the second, third, and fourth tests, effectiveness with projectiles were 0.61, 0.51, and 0.44. In addition, these tests had effectiveness with cartridge cases equivalent to 0.55, 0.43, and 0.44. Results are useful to establish routine protocols, system improvements, or comparative assessment of other electronic systems.

show abstract

Ballistic fingerprinting databases

Cited by 15 publications

References 1 publication

The contribution of forensic science to crime analysis and investigation: Forensic intelligence

The contribution of forensic science to crime analysis and investigation: Forensic intelligence

Reference ballistic imaging database performance

Influence Factors Regarding the Effectiveness of Automated Ballistic Comparison on 0.38 Special Caliber Bullets and Cartridge Cases

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About