2014
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.90.195431
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ballistic- and quantum-conductor carbon nanotubes: A reference experiment put to the test

Abstract: International audienc

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(76 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unexpectedly however, similar results were shown for several different materials [11,12], and even for lower quality CNTs made in CVD processes [13]. A serious flaw in the method was later revealed, showing that the nanotubes may not actually penetrate the Mercury liquid, but instead the surface of the Mercury is deformed [14][15][16]. The small changes in resistance would then merely reflect resistance changes at the same fixed contact point as the pressure towards the liquid surface was varied [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Unexpectedly however, similar results were shown for several different materials [11,12], and even for lower quality CNTs made in CVD processes [13]. A serious flaw in the method was later revealed, showing that the nanotubes may not actually penetrate the Mercury liquid, but instead the surface of the Mercury is deformed [14][15][16]. The small changes in resistance would then merely reflect resistance changes at the same fixed contact point as the pressure towards the liquid surface was varied [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…However, the reliability of these measurements has been strongly criticized. Studies [40,41] argued that the used liquid-metal contact method gives "false positive" results for the ballistic nature of conductance. The theory of quantum resistance assumes the absence of the CNT structural defects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both parameters are measurable by experiments. 2,3 At the mesoscopic level, the distribution and geometry of the embedded CNTs in a polymer matrix are crucial for the overall conductivity. The possibility of percolating pathways depends not only on the manufacturing of the CNTs itself but also on the manufacturing process of the composite like infusion or printing of CNRP as well as intentionally set conditions like externally applied electric or magnetic fields 2 that are influencing the orientation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%