Mitigating cetacean entanglement in fishing industries is of global interest. Strategies include the use of acoustic alarms to warn whales of fishing gear. For baleen whales, responses to acoustic alarms are poorly understood. This behavioural response study compared the behaviour of humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) in their feeding grounds off Iceland prior to, during, and after exposure to a low-frequency whale pinger (Future Oceans) and a high-frequency seal scarer (Lofitech ltd.). Linear mixed effects models and binary generalized linear mixed effects models were used to analyze the effect of the alarms on surface feeding, swimming speed, breathing rate, directness and dive time. We observed a significant decrease in surface feeding and a significant increase in swimming speed during exposure to the whale pinger. Changes in dive time between the phases of a trial differed significantly between individuals indicating that responses may depend on individual or behavioural state. We did not find any significant reactions in response to the seal scarer. In addition to the experimental exposures, a trial of whale pingers on a capelin purse seine net was conducted. Results from this trial showed that whales entered the net from the bottom while the pingers were attached at the top, but the encircled whales were able to locate an opening free of pingers and escape without damaging the net. Our results suggest that whale pingers may be a useful entanglement mitigation tool in humpback whale feeding grounds given that a reduction in feeding around nets likely reduces the risk of whales swimming through them. Pingers may also minimize net damage if whales are encircled by aiding the whales in finding their way out. However, given the uncertain long-term consequences of the behavioural changes reported here, whale pingers are most advisable for short-term use in conjunction with other entanglement mitigation measures.