Balancing time use for children’s fitness and adiposity: Evidence to inform 24-hour guidelines for sleep, sedentary time and physical activity

Dumuid, Dorothea; Wake, Melissa; Burgner, David; Tremblay, Mark S.; Okely, Anthony D.; Edwards, Ben; Dwyer, Terence; Olds, Tim

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0245501

Cited by 21 publications

(25 citation statements)

References 43 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, our study cannot fully explain the underlying mechanism linking 24-h movement guidelines to better AA in adolescents, which requires further investigation by adding cognitive measures during EEG, fNIRS, and/or fMRI. Regarding the health benefits of adherence to the 24-h movement guidelines [33,38,39], it is recommended to improve levels of each behaviour to meet the 24-h movement guidelines for health promotion. Numerous studies have reported Health promotion benefits of interventions to improve children and youth of PA, particularly in educational settings [40,41].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Meeting 24-h Movement Guidelines is Related to Better Academic Achievement: Findings from the YRBS 2019 Cycle

Liu¹,

Yu²,

Hossain³

et al. 2022

International Journal of Mental Health Promotion

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Meeting 24-h Movement Guidelines is Related to Better Academic Achievement: Findings from the YRBS 2019 Cycle

Liu¹,

Yu²,

Hossain³

et al. 2022

International Journal of Mental Health Promotion

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…It is plausible that increasing LIPA by decreasing MVPA at work may provide the "just right" dose and type of physical activity for promoting musculoskeletal health and work participation among employees with LBP. Future longitudinal studies should focus on testing such hypotheses by including duration and type of all physical activity inside and outside of work and use statistical methods that are able to take into account all parameters, as used in this study [46]. During leisure, increasing MVPA time by decreasing time in the remaining leisure behaviors (i.e., sedentary, standing, LIPA, and time in bed) was associated with a reduced LTSA risk.…”

Section: Employees With Lbp At Baselinementioning

confidence: 99%

Physical Activity Advice for Prevention and Rehabilitation of Low Back Pain- Same or Different? A Study on Device-Measured Physical Activity and Register-Based Sickness Absence

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose We lack knowledge on whether the advice of “being physically active” should be the same for prevention and rehabilitation of low back pain (LBP). Sickness absence is a key outcome for LBP prevention and rehabilitation. We investigated the associations between physical activity and long-term sickness absence (LTSA) among employees with and without LBP. Methods Between 2011 and 2013, 925 Danish employees wore a Actigraph GTX3 accelerometer for 1–5 workdays to measure physical activity and reported LBP in past 7 days. Employees were followed for 4 years to determine their first register-based LTSA event (≥ 6 consecutive weeks). Results Among employees with LBP, increasing moderate-to-vigorous-intensity physical activity at work by 20 min and decreasing the remaining behaviors at work (ie., sitting, standing and light-intensity activity) by 20 min was associated with 38% (95% CI 17%; 63%) higher LTSA risk. Increasing light-intensity activity at work by 20 min and decreasing 20 min from the remaining behaviors was associated with 18% (95% CI 4%; 30%) lower risk. During leisure, increasing moderate-to-vigorous-intensity activity by 20 min or standing by 40 min was associated with 26% (95% CI 3%; 43%) lower and 37% (95% CI 0%; 87%) higher risk, respectively. Among employees without LBP, we found no such associations. Conclusions The physical activity advice ought to be different for LBP prevention and rehabilitation to reduce LTSA risk, and specified by domain and activity intensity. At work, employees with LBP should be advised to spend time on light-intensity physical activity and limit their time on moderate-to-vigorous-intensity physical activity. During leisure, employees should spend time on moderate-to-vigorous-intensity physical activity.

show abstract

“…Our study found differential health associations for the overall movement behaviour composition (i.e., associated with internalising problems only) and recreational screen use (i.e., associated with externalising problems and psychological distress), which suggests that different types of behaviours may contribute to different dimensions of psychosocial health. This underscores the importance of considering the influences of both intensity- and domain-specific movement behaviours when determining the ‘ideal’ daily time-use composition [ 69 ] for optimal psychosocial health. Further research is needed to investigate the directionality and potential mechanisms underlying the compositional associations between movement behaviours and psychosocial health.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Associations between 24-Hour Movement Behaviours, Recreational Screen Use and Psychosocial Health Outcomes in Children: A Compositional Data Analysis Approach

Chong

Parrish

Cliff

et al. 2021

IJERPH

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

It remains unclear whether the time-use composition of 24-h movement behaviours (sleep, sedentary time (ST), physical activity (PA)) and recreational screen use are independently associated with psychosocial health. This study examined the cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between 24-h movement behaviour composition, recreational screen use and psychosocial health outcomes in children. Measures completed at baseline (n = 127; 11.7 years) and follow-up (n = 88; 12.8 years) included accelerometer-based 24-h movement behaviours, self-reported recreational screen use and psychosocial health (Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, Kessler’s Psychological Distress Scale). Linear mixed models were used to examine the cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between the 24-h movement behaviour composition and recreational screen use levels with psychosocial health outcomes. Overall, the movement behaviour composition (p < 0.05) and recreational screen use levels (p < 0.01) were both cross-sectionally but not longitudinally associated with psychosocial health outcomes. Relative to other behaviours, sleep was negatively associated, while light-intensity PA was positively associated with internalising problems and total difficulties scores. ST was positively associated with internalising problems. High levels of recreational screen use (>2 h/day) were associated with greater externalising problems, total difficulties scores and psychological distress. These findings reinforce the importance of achieving a balance between different types of movement behaviours over a 24-h period for psychosocial health.

show abstract

Balancing time use for children’s fitness and adiposity: Evidence to inform 24-hour guidelines for sleep, sedentary time and physical activity

Cited by 21 publications

References 43 publications

Meeting 24-h Movement Guidelines is Related to Better Academic Achievement: Findings from the YRBS 2019 Cycle

Meeting 24-h Movement Guidelines is Related to Better Academic Achievement: Findings from the YRBS 2019 Cycle

Physical Activity Advice for Prevention and Rehabilitation of Low Back Pain- Same or Different? A Study on Device-Measured Physical Activity and Register-Based Sickness Absence

Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Associations between 24-Hour Movement Behaviours, Recreational Screen Use and Psychosocial Health Outcomes in Children: A Compositional Data Analysis Approach

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About