Balancing state and volunteer investment in biodiversity monitoring for the implementation of CBD indicators: A French example

Abstract

International audienceAccording to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), states have to provide indicators in order to assess the performance of their initiatives for halting the loss of biodiversity. Sixteen headline indicators have been identified for monitoring the CBD targets. Of these indicators only one, "Trends in the abundance and distribution of selected species," is a direct headline indicator of "non-exploited" biodiversity. In France, the implementation of this indicator is completely dependent on data collected by volunteers. Since this investment of volunteer time is equivalent to savings in administrative costs, we attempt in this paper to assign it a monetary value. This enables us to estimate how much the French administration saves thanks to volunteer efforts and how much public funding would have to be invested if volunteers were no longer willing to participate in these biodiversity monitoring schemes. We estimate this amount to be between 678,523 and 4,415,251 euros per year, depending on the scenario selected. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved

The World Flora Online, Target 1 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation, and the Species Plantarum Programme: Flora of the World: Compatible Concepts or Mutually Exclusive Mandates?

“…En France, 72 % des suivis de biodiversité sont réalisés par des bénévoles (Levrel et al, 2010). Comme dans la majorité des sciences de la nature, qualifiée de « science de plein air » (Callon et al, 2001), où la récolte de données sur de vastes espaces géographiques et de longues périodes de temps est particulièrement importante, la participation citoyenne à la recherche en biodiversité est une source de travail et de compétences non négligeables (Baretto et al, 2003;Bonney et Labranche, 2004;McCaffrey, 2005;Charvolin et al, 2007;Heaton et al, 2011), notamment en botanique, particulièrement sujette à la participation des amateurs (Keeney, 1992;Secord,1994;Livesey, 2005).…”

Citizen Science with GIS&T

“…In the EU, wild birds are protected by The Birds Directive 12 and in a number of European countries they are monitored by networks of volunteers through the Pan-European Common Bird Monitoring Scheme, jointly led by BirdLife International and the European Bird Census Council (EEA, 2013). In France, the National Museum of Natural History organises the Vigie-Nature monitoring programme, which relies on citizen scientists and saves the French government an estimated €1-4 million per year (Levrel et al, 2010). A 2011 study based on volunteer-collected data from the Swedish Bird Survey concluded that monitoring by citizen scientists could prove useful in future assessments of wild bird populations and help to inform more targeted and efficient conservation efforts (Snäll et al, 2011).…”

A Review of the Tools Used for Marine Monitoring in the UK: Combining Historic and Contemporary Methods with Modeling and Socioeconomics to Fulfill Legislative Needs and Scientific Ambitions

“…There has been a recent proliferation of studies in the marine environment, with a 2014 review identifying 227 publications with a reference to citizen science (Thiel et al, 2014). The value of citizen science to support monitoring is significant (Levrel et al, 2010;Defra, 2011;Theobald et al, 2015) and governments are recognizing the potential benefits of using citizen science (Postnote, 2014).…”