2020
DOI: 10.5304/jafscd.2020.094.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Balancing Social Values with Economic Realities: Farmer Experience with a Cost-offset CSA

Abstract: Some farmers are offering subsidized or "cost-offset" community supported agriculture (CO-CSA) shares as a strategy to counter market saturation and improve low-income families' access to fresh local foods. However, little is known about farm-

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our experience aligns with that of other researchers (Guthman et al, 2006;Hinrichs & Kremer, 2002) who report that many farmers know and understand the needs and preferences of lowincome families and have developed their own ways of accommodating this consumer group (Sitaker et al, 2020). Still, farmers experienced dropouts, late payments, and missed pickups 1 http://collections.evergreen.edu/s/repository/item/6979 (Sitaker et al, 2020), and sometimes struggled with initiating "difficult conversations" with CO-CSA members about these issues. As other research affirms, customer commitment to the CSA model ensures better compliance and retention (Galt et al, 2017;Pole & Kumar, 2015).…”
Section: Farmer Satisfaction With Continuation Planning Processsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Our experience aligns with that of other researchers (Guthman et al, 2006;Hinrichs & Kremer, 2002) who report that many farmers know and understand the needs and preferences of lowincome families and have developed their own ways of accommodating this consumer group (Sitaker et al, 2020). Still, farmers experienced dropouts, late payments, and missed pickups 1 http://collections.evergreen.edu/s/repository/item/6979 (Sitaker et al, 2020), and sometimes struggled with initiating "difficult conversations" with CO-CSA members about these issues. As other research affirms, customer commitment to the CSA model ensures better compliance and retention (Galt et al, 2017;Pole & Kumar, 2015).…”
Section: Farmer Satisfaction With Continuation Planning Processsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…While executing fundraising and outreach activities was sometimes challenging due to pressing farm responsibilities, most farmers were committed to offering the CO-CSA after study funding ended. As previously reported, F3HK farmers were strongly motivated to ensure equitable access to the food they grow, and saw CO-CSA as a way to do this (Sitaker et al, 2020). Nevertheless, a question remains regarding the economic impact of adding a CO-CSA program to a farm business' revenue stream (Sitaker et al, 2020).…”
Section: Farmer Satisfaction With Continuation Planning Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations