2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.12.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Balancing sensory inputs: Sensory reweighting of ankle proprioception and vision during a bipedal posture task

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To find the effects of the investigated postures on the possible preferential use of different sensory afferents, we examined the subjects with the manipulation of visual input. Such an experimental protocol provides unique opportunities to reveal how sensory and motor signals are integrated to control the upright body (Paillard, Bizid & Dupui, 2007; Kabbaligere, Lee & Layne, 2017; Rasman et al, 2018). However, the results failed to find any interactions between the postural condition and vision in any of the sway indices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To find the effects of the investigated postures on the possible preferential use of different sensory afferents, we examined the subjects with the manipulation of visual input. Such an experimental protocol provides unique opportunities to reveal how sensory and motor signals are integrated to control the upright body (Paillard, Bizid & Dupui, 2007; Kabbaligere, Lee & Layne, 2017; Rasman et al, 2018). However, the results failed to find any interactions between the postural condition and vision in any of the sway indices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chiba et al also reviewed the human standing posture control by visual, vestibular, somatosensory, and tactile inputs (Chiba et al, 2016). Kabbaligere et al studied the effect of visual and vestibular inputs on bipedal posture tasks and they found that sensory reweighting occurred when sensory input was disturbed (Kabbaligere et al, 2017). Claeys et al investigated how proprioception and visual information change the strategy required to maintain balance (Claeys et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The failure to observe the changes of CoP in present study might be explained by the difference of vibration frequency. The vibration frequency in present study was around 150 Hz, while some previous studies used between 60 to 100 Hz [41][42][43]. Therefore, a vibration frquency of 150 Hz may be less effective to stimulate muscle spindle and induce postural sway.…”
Section: Effect Of Vibration On Postural Balance Variables In No Sounmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Another reason might relate to the area of the vibrator attached. The studies that placed a vibrator on the archilles tendon instead of the muscles to disrupt proprioceptive cue from the ankle and found the backwad sway [31] or the increase in the COP displacement and angular displacement of hip, knee, and ankle joints [43].…”
Section: Effect Of Vibration On Postural Balance Variables In No Sounmentioning
confidence: 99%