Balancing sampling intensity against spatial coverage for a community science monitoring programme

Abstract

Community science is an increasingly integral part of biodiversity research and monitoring, often achieving broad spatial and temporal coverage but lower sampling intensity than studies conducted by professional scientists. When designing a community‐science monitoring programme, careful assessment of sampling designs that could be both feasible and successful at meeting programme goals is essential. Monarch butterflies (Danaus plexippus) are the focus of several successful community‐science projects in the U.S., but broader coverage is needed to monitor breeding areas and explain population declines observed in overwintering areas. The U.S. Monarch Conservation Science Partnership's Integrated Monarch Monitoring Program (IMMP) will representatively monitor monarchs and milkweed across North America. We performed a simulation‐based power analysis to predict trade‐offs between sampling breadth (number of sites and years) and sampling intensity (number of visits or subplots per site and year) for the IMMP. We evaluated whether each sampling design would produce sufficient statistical power to detect population trends and differences among land‐use sectors in densities of milkweed, monarch eggs, and adult monarchs. Sampling breadth had much stronger effects than sampling intensity on statistical power for all three monitoring targets. Depending on land‐use sector, monitoring 400–800 sites over 10–15 years would detect trends in densities of milkweed and adult monarchs, but no scenarios were successful for monarch eggs. Sampling 400–800 sites would also detect small (for adult monarchs) to large (for milkweed) differences among land‐use sectors in density of all three monitoring targets within the first 2–5 years. As more data become available from the IMMP, the sampling goals can be updated. Synthesis and applications. Careful sample design is an essential step in developing a successful monitoring programme. For monarchs and milkweed, we found that sampling breadth (number of sites and years) had a much stronger effect on statistical power than sampling intensity (number of visits or subsamples per site), suggesting field protocols could be tailored to maximize recruitment and retention of volunteers by minimizing the effort required to monitor each site. Many long‐term monitoring programmes might similarly benefit from evaluating the statistical trade‐offs between sampling breadth and intensity in their sampling designs.

Patterns of Vespa velutina invasion in Portugal using crowdsourced data

“…In addition, the precise determination of foundresses dispersal ability will contribute to refine predictive models (Poidatz et al, 2018), and crowdsourcing data will allow for collection of larger amounts of information. Yet, attention must be paid to the use of these data for modelling purposes, as opportunistic observations could be spatially biased and/or confused by other similar species if not properly validated (Weiser et al, 2019). Systematic field studies are important to gather reliable absence data, to standardise sampling intensity and to assess whether reported nest locations resulted from diferences in human population and observation density or represent an ecological preference (Monceau & Thiéry, 2017).…”

Experimenting With the Past to Improve Environmental Monitoring

“…Using prior knowledge about the system under question, a virtual ecologist (Zurell et al, 2010) approach would use simulation models constructed to incorporate key factors that affect species dynamics. With an appropriate model, simulations can then be run for a variety of scenarios, including changing the number of samples taken per year, altering the number of sites sampled, and sampling for different lengths of time (Rhodes and Jonzen, 2011;Barry et al, 2017;Christie et al, 2019;Weiser et al, 2019;White, 2019). Simulations can also be useful in deciding which streams of data to use (Weiser et al, 2020) or the effect of changing sampling methodology during the course of a study (Southwell et al, 2019).…”

Drivers of spatio-temporal variation in mosquito submissions to the citizen science project ‘Mückenatlas’

“…Citizen science monitoring programmes can prepare for this urban clustering and overrepresentation of observations from artificial surfaces by adapting protocol design and regulating the recruitment of participants (e.g. by creating sample units with fixed numbers of participants), by clearly defining their research questions and project goals, and by developing strategies for appropriate data analysis 75,76 .…”