2021 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/ssci50451.2021.9660104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Balancing Accuracy and Interpretability through Neuro-Fuzzy Models for Cardiovascular Risk Assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another interesting and recent approach is presented in [ 79 ]. More specifically, a neuro-fuzzy (NF) decision support system (namely, a combination of neural networks with fuzzy logic [ 80 ]) is proposed for learning predictive models in form of fuzzy rules, to assess cardiovascular risk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another interesting and recent approach is presented in [ 79 ]. More specifically, a neuro-fuzzy (NF) decision support system (namely, a combination of neural networks with fuzzy logic [ 80 ]) is proposed for learning predictive models in form of fuzzy rules, to assess cardiovascular risk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason for this is climate change [ 50 ], which is increasingly affecting agricultural production. Based on these reasons, future research should consider using an adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) since algorithms applying this system have proven to be efficient in decision support [ 51 ]. Additionally, this model reduces the possible decision-making errors made by experts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [20], neuro-fuzzy systems were used to learn predictive models from training data to create decision rules meant to support the decision-making process in cardiovascular risk assessment. The reported accuracy has reached 0.91, proving that artificial intelligence models are a valuable help for clinicians.…”
Section: Hybrid Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%