2012
DOI: 10.1109/tthz.2011.2177726
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Balanced Receiver Technology Development for the Caltech Submillimeter Observatory

Abstract: Abstract-The

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We find between 180−280 GHz a front-end equivalent noise temperature (T rf ) of 18−21 K and between 390−520 GHz a front-end equivalent noise temperature of 8−9 K. These losses include vignetting and spillover and are considerably worse for the 230 receiver then the 460 receiver due to the fast optics. In addition the AR coated HDPE pressure window was optimized for the 460 GHz atmospheric band [1]. A detailed breakdown of the noise budget at three frequencies across the mixer band is provided in Tables V II & V III. In Fig.…”
Section: Heterodyne Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We find between 180−280 GHz a front-end equivalent noise temperature (T rf ) of 18−21 K and between 390−520 GHz a front-end equivalent noise temperature of 8−9 K. These losses include vignetting and spillover and are considerably worse for the 230 receiver then the 460 receiver due to the fast optics. In addition the AR coated HDPE pressure window was optimized for the 460 GHz atmospheric band [1]. A detailed breakdown of the noise budget at three frequencies across the mixer band is provided in Tables V II & V III. In Fig.…”
Section: Heterodyne Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is of interest therefore to establish the actual vs. modeled noise rejection. It should be noted that a second, and possibly equally important, motivation for balanced mixers is the efficiency with which the local oscillator carrier signal may be injected [1].…”
Section: Spurious Signal and Amplitude Noise Rejectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The balanced receiver scheme offers several advantages over the single-ended mixer configuration such as all available LO power can be utilized and it ideally provides immunity to amplitude modulations from the LO source [33], which is predominantly limiting the stability of HEB receivers [34]. However, the balanced configuration is more complex than its single-ended counterpart and comprises of a RF hybrid, which combines the RF and LO single, two HEB mixers, which ideally exhibit identical electrical properties, and an in-phase IF combiner [30].…”
Section: Balanced Waveguide Heterodyne Receiver At 13 Thzmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The isolation of the balanced mixer depends on the amplitude and phase balance of the different components. The LO sideband noise rejection ratio (LNR) has been defined to express the performance of the balanced mixer [12]. The LNR was simply estimated by the quotient of the conversion losses measured at the two IF output ports [13].…”
Section: Port3 Port4mentioning
confidence: 99%