2004
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gnh070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Balanced-PCR amplification allows unbiased identification of genomic copy changes in minute cell and tissue samples

Abstract: Analysis of genomic DNA derived from cells and fresh or fixed tissues often requires whole genome amplification prior to microarray screening. Technical hurdles to this process are the introduction of amplification bias and/or the inhibitory effects of formalin fixation on DNA amplification. Here we demonstrate a balanced-PCR procedure that allows unbiased amplification of genomic DNA from fresh or modestly degraded paraffin-embedded DNA samples. Following digestion and ligation of a target and a control genom… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
49
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
49
2
Order By: Relevance
“…14 In contrast to a previous observation 13 of almost complete failure of Phi29 to amplify DNA from FFPE sample, we have demonstrated similar amplification efficiencies in DNA from pairs of archival fresh-frozen and FFPE tumor and a similar average product length of DNA amplified from corresponding tissue specimens. …”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…14 In contrast to a previous observation 13 of almost complete failure of Phi29 to amplify DNA from FFPE sample, we have demonstrated similar amplification efficiencies in DNA from pairs of archival fresh-frozen and FFPE tumor and a similar average product length of DNA amplified from corresponding tissue specimens. …”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…8 -10 The utility of Phi29-based whole genome amplification has been shown for plasmid and bacteriophage DNA 11 as well as human DNA from whole blood, buccal swabs, buffy coats, and cultured cells. 6,[12][13][14] However, this technique results in biased gene representation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 -14 The success of WGA itself also depends on sample quality. 9,16 Certain types of WGA such as multiple displacement amplification perform well with fresh or snap-frozen (intact) DNA, [17][18][19] but their yield 9 and accuracy 20,21 diminish on DNA fragmentation. WGA methods that can tolerate various degrees of sample degradation have been recently developed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For quantification, the data were analyzed using the LightCycler analysis software (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). Relative quantification of target gene expression was evaluated using the comparative C T method (Wang et al, 2004). The ΔC T value was determined by subtracting the target C T of each sample from its respective GAPDH C T value.…”
Section: Real-time Quantitative Pcr Analysis (Qpcr)mentioning
confidence: 99%