2006
DOI: 10.1137/s009753970444435x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Balanced Allocations: The Heavily Loaded Case

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
267
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 160 publications
(275 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
8
267
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, if the number of choices d is allowed to (slowly) grow with the deviation in the probability distribution, the maximum load is again bounded by m n + O(ln ln(n)) (which complies with [11]). The presented bounds are tight in a way that a smaller d leads to a deviation of the load linear in m.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…However, if the number of choices d is allowed to (slowly) grow with the deviation in the probability distribution, the maximum load is again bounded by m n + O(ln ln(n)) (which complies with [11]). The presented bounds are tight in a way that a smaller d leads to a deviation of the load linear in m.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Balls-into-bins processes have been extensively studied in the area of parallel and distributed computing, mainly to address balanced-allocation problems [19][20][21], PRAM simulation [22] and hashing [23]. In order to optimize the total number of random bin choices used for the allocation, further allocation strategies have been proposed and analyzed (see, e.g., [24][25][26][27][28]).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wieder [12] demonstrates that in the scenario of Byers et al the maximum difference between the loads grows with m. Thus, for m ≫ n the bounds are not as tight as in the standard case [11]. However, if the number of choices d is allowed to (slowly) grow with the deviation in the probability distribution, the maximum load is again bounded by m n + O(ln ln(n)) (which complies with [11]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%