2013
DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2011.633891
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Balance of payment crises in emerging markets: how early were the ‘early’ warning signals?

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
32
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
4
32
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The recent literature has focused on the identification of crises and imbalances for large samples of countries, including both developing and developed economies (Rose and Spiegel, 2011;Frankel and Saravelos, 2012). Alternatively, attention has been given to developing and emerging economies (Berg et al, 2005;Bussiere, 2013;Davis and Karim, 2008) or the OECD countries (Barrell et al, 2010;Alessi and Detken, 2011). …”
Section: Countries In the Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recent literature has focused on the identification of crises and imbalances for large samples of countries, including both developing and developed economies (Rose and Spiegel, 2011;Frankel and Saravelos, 2012). Alternatively, attention has been given to developing and emerging economies (Berg et al, 2005;Bussiere, 2013;Davis and Karim, 2008) or the OECD countries (Barrell et al, 2010;Alessi and Detken, 2011). …”
Section: Countries In the Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason for which the logit model is preferred is because the logistic distribution (logit model) has heavier tails than the normal distribution (probit model) (Manasse, Roubini and Schimmelpfennig, 2003;Bussière, 2007). However, differences are small (Cornelli, 2014).…”
Section: Binary Logit Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to the signal approach, the logit and probit models have advantages. First, the methods consider all the variables simultaneously (Kaminsky, Lizondo and Reinhart, 1998), and second, the independent variables can have a nonlinear effect on the probability of a crisis, which is appropriate because of the presence of strong nonlinear effects in currency crises mechanisms (Bussière, 2007).…”
Section: Logit Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the weights are frequently the inverse of the standard deviation ( ) of the corresponding component. However, Bussiere and Fratzscher (2006) and Bussiere (2013) prefer to use the inverse of the variance ( 2  ) of the corresponding component. On the other hand, some authors also utilize arbitrary weights: for instance in Corsetti et al (2001) the weights assigned to exchange rate and reserves are, respectively, 0.75 and 0.25.…”
Section: Dating Crises: a Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%