1997
DOI: 10.1080/07421222.1997.11518155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Balance in Business Reengineering: An Empirical Study of Fit and Performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, the nature and the degree of methodological fit will vary along the variety of business process management types. A clear parallel could be observed with the research done by Huizing et al (1997). The latter study deserves the merit of having formalized a degree of fit between the level of ambition of a I-BPM effort and five fundamental change dimensions.…”
Section: 'How It All Fits': An Integrated Approach Towards Business Psupporting
confidence: 52%
“…In other words, the nature and the degree of methodological fit will vary along the variety of business process management types. A clear parallel could be observed with the research done by Huizing et al (1997). The latter study deserves the merit of having formalized a degree of fit between the level of ambition of a I-BPM effort and five fundamental change dimensions.…”
Section: 'How It All Fits': An Integrated Approach Towards Business Psupporting
confidence: 52%
“…In the IS literature, fit has also been examined in the context of alignment (Chan et al, 1997), interorganizational relationships (Premkumar et al, 2005), IT implementation (Khazanchi, 2005), technology requirements and work group communications (Belanger et al, 2001), and business reengineering (Huizing & Koster, 1997). While the TTF perspective is prominent in IS literature, the concept of fit has been around for sometime in organizational behavior and strategic management literature.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Davenport (1997) argues that BPR failed in many firms because firms failed to consider the secondary effects of consequent organizational disruptions. Clemons et al (1995) and Huizing et al (1997) argue that successful reengineering must be linked to the overall strategy of the firm. The early successful reports from BPR advocates (e.g., Caron et al, 1994) note the importance of senior management commitment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%