Balance de la actuación del Instituto Nacional de Colonización en la provincia de Jaén

Abstract

versión resumida de este trabajo se presentó como ponencia en el I Simposio nacional «Pueblos de colonización durante el franquismo. La arquitectura en la modernización del territorio rural», organizado por

The Effects of Tourism on Local Development in Protected Nature Areas: The Case of Three Nature Parks of Sierra Morena (Andalusia, Spain)

“…The NtPs have the particularity that most of the protected area is a private property [91,92], reaching 98% in SH [21,93], and historically large estates were developed [94,95]. SAPA and SNS have a significant area (Table 2) and have population settlements inside, while SH has a smaller area and lacks an internal network of settlements [21,96].…”

“…In contrast, they ask if there is the possibility of "increasing the number of tourists without environmental costs" (Int33) and claim low tourism rates (Int27, Int31, Int32, Int33). The management of NtPs and the protection of their environmental values, given the increase in recreational and tourist activities and the growing number of visitors, is complicated [27] in territorial contexts that lack physical barriers and where most of the property is privately owned [21,91,92,93]. Thus, there is no limit, such as physical load capacity or a control instrument [106], to guarantee protection [14].…”

“…The latter is a redundant topic among agricultural entrepreneurs who emphasises the difficulties of finding workers in the season due to tourism as a source of attraction that offers advantages over primary activities [125]. The conflicts between visitors and traditional activities result from urban visitors understanding that the countryside belongs to everyone [77,92]. It results in competition and is a source of conflict between antagonistic activities [39].…”

The Effects of Tourism on Local Development in Protected Nature Areas: The Case of Three Nature Parks of the Sierra Morena (Andalusia, Spain)

“…SAPA and SNS have a significant area (Table 2) and have population settlements within them, while SH has a smaller area and lacks an internal network of settlements [21,96]. The NtPs have the particularity that most of their protected area is private property [91,92], reaching 98% in SH [21,93], and historically large estates were developed [94,95]. SAPA and SNS have a significant area (Table 2) and have population settlements within them, while SH has a smaller area and lacks an internal network of settlements [21,96].…”

Implicaciones territoriales de una gran obra hidráulica: el embalse del Tranco (cabecera del Guadalquivir)

“…Se impulsó dicho proyecto a través del «Plan de obras, colonización, industrialización y electrificación de la provincia de Jaén», aprobado mediante Ley en 1953, en el cual se contemplaba, siguiendo las directrices marcadas por la política de colonización agraria del primer franquismo (Araque Jiménez et al, 2006), la transformación en regadío de las vegas próximas al Guadalquivir a lo largo de casi todo su recorrido por la provincia jiennense. Era esta la única forma de compensar, al menos en parte, a los defraudados agricultores de la comarca de La Loma de Úbeda después de haberse esfumado el proyecto decimonónico del canal de riego, y también de atender las aspiraciones de otros muchos agricultores del resto del valle bético que aun sin aspirar a proyectos tan grandilocuentes, nunca había cejado en el empeño de llevar el agua hasta sus campos.…”