2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation 2011
DOI: 10.1109/icra.2011.5980324
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bag of multimodal LDA models for concept formation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accuracy of Estimated Words granularity of categories. Selective attention is the key to model this granularity of categories as discussed in [3]. Another problem to be considered is features of the perceptual information.…”
Section: Inferring Words For Unseen Objectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Accuracy of Estimated Words granularity of categories. Selective attention is the key to model this granularity of categories as discussed in [3]. Another problem to be considered is features of the perceptual information.…”
Section: Inferring Words For Unseen Objectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An online variational Bayes (VB) algorithm for LDA is shown to be converged to a local optimum of the VB objective function in [13]. We extend Gibbs sampling-based LDA instead of VB-based LDA because Gibbs sampling yields better results in multimodal categorization [3]. Moreover, Gibbs sampling-based LDA has an easy to implement property.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather than a hierarchical structure, these categories, which can be thought of as concepts, have very complex structures. To form such categories, we extended the MLDA to the bag of multimodal LDA (BoMLDA) [7], in which weights for multimodal information are introduced. This model consists of a large number of MLDA models, each of which has a different set of weights for multimodal information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they use hand-crafted features with a relatively small number of dimensions. They extend their work in [60] to cope with complex categories structures, for instance when an object belongs to several categories such as toy and soft. To do this, they run their clustering algorithm several times and select relevant clusterings based on correlations with words utterances from the verbal description of objects.…”
Section: Multimodal Fusionmentioning
confidence: 99%