2022
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-anthro-041420-112543
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bad Mouths: Taboo and Transgressive Language

Abstract: The academic literature on taboo language is flourishing not only in fields such as linguistic anthropology or sociolinguistics, but also in disciplines that usually target language itself as the object of study. Although there is more than a century of scholarly writing on taboo language, new and neglected areas and directions continue to provide valuable insights on a universal linguistic behavior. This review tracks four sometimes overlapping clusters: naming and linguistic avoidance behaviors, taboo langua… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 58 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The differences between Chinese and Western taboos can be initially summarized by different historical traditions, customs, religious beliefs, values, and other factors. In cross-cultural communication, a lack of understanding of the content of the other party's taboo language, or unintentional violation of the other party's taboo language habits, usually results in communicative failures and even leads to the breakdown of benign social relations between the two parties [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differences between Chinese and Western taboos can be initially summarized by different historical traditions, customs, religious beliefs, values, and other factors. In cross-cultural communication, a lack of understanding of the content of the other party's taboo language, or unintentional violation of the other party's taboo language habits, usually results in communicative failures and even leads to the breakdown of benign social relations between the two parties [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%