2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2005.11947
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bad($\mathbf{w}$) is hyperplane absolute winning

Victor Beresnevich,
Erez Nesharim,
Lei Yang

Abstract: In 1998 Kleinbock conjectured that any set of weighted badly approximable d × n real matrices is a winning subset in the sense of Schmidt's game. In this paper we prove this conjecture in full for vectors in R d in arbitrary dimensions by showing that the corresponding set of weighted badly approximable vectors is hyperplane absolute winning. The proof uses the Cantor potential game played on the support of Ahlfors regular absolutely decaying measures and the quantitative nondivergence estimate for a class of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As we mentioned in the introduction it is currently known from [GY19] that Bad(r) is hyperplane absolute winning in the case r 1 = • • • = r n−1 ≥ r n . Further developing the ideas of this paper in [BNY20] we establish the following unconditional result. Theorem 6.1.…”
Section: Final Remarksmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As we mentioned in the introduction it is currently known from [GY19] that Bad(r) is hyperplane absolute winning in the case r 1 = • • • = r n−1 ≥ r n . Further developing the ideas of this paper in [BNY20] we establish the following unconditional result. Theorem 6.1.…”
Section: Final Remarksmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…In particular, in [BNY20] we further develop the framework of intersections with fractals which requires suitable extensions of Lemmas 1.3 and 1.4 underlining the equivalence (1.7). Also, in [BNY20] we demonstrate an equivalent approach that uses Cantor winning sets instead of generalised Cantor sets discussed in §2.2 above.…”
Section: Final Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%