Bad Faith Conduct of States in Violation of the 'Fair And Equitable Treatment' Standard in International Investment Law and Arbitration

Draguiev, Deyan

doi:10.1093/jnlids/idu002

Cited by 30 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Ayrıca, İspanyol hukukunda da asimetrik tahkim kayıtlarının geçerli olduğuna ilişkin bir yargı kararı bulunmaktadır. Asimetrik tahkim kayıtlarının geçerli olduğu Madrid Temyiz Mahkemesi'nde kabul edilmiştir 44 . Fransız Mahkemesi de 1972 ve 1974 tarihlerinde vermiş, kararlarda asimetrik kayıtların hukuken onaylanabileceği görüşündedir 45 .…”

Section: B Geçersiz Olduğunu Ileri Süren Görüşunclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Validity of Arbitration Agreements in Turkish Law and Asymmetric and Pathological Arbitration Clauses

Yilmaz

Çavuşoğlu

2020

Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Arbitration, which has survived from ancient times to the present, is an alternative solution to the state judiciary. The main thing is that the sovereign has judicial power. Judicial activity is carried out by the state like a monopoly. However, some disputes may be requested to be resolved by a special arbitration board instead of being resolved by the state judiciary. If the parties requested a final and binding decision of the arbitrator or arbitral tribunal, the concept of arbitration emerges. In this case, the main thing is state judgment; however, exceptionally, the parties may choose the arbitral tribunal. Since this trial is not a state trial, although it allows flexibility to the parties, it is subject to some conditions. The arbitration agreement shall be in writing, it should be on a specific or identifiable subject, and the arbitration will shall be clear and precise. The statement that the will of arbitration should be clear and final. This concept may cause problems in practice. For example, asymmetric and pathological arbitration records are deemed invalid on the ground that the party's will is not clear and precise. This situation is in

show abstract

Section: B Geçersiz Olduğunu Ileri Süren Görüşunclassified

“…Asimetrik tahkim kayıtlarının geçerli olduğu Madrid Temyiz Mahkemesi'nde kabul edilmiştir 44 . Fransız Mahkemesi de 1972 ve 1974 tarihlerinde vermiş, kararlarda asimetrik kayıtların hukuken onaylanabileceği görüşündedir 45 .…”

Section: B Geçersiz Olduğunu Ileri Süren Görüşunclassified

Validity of Arbitration Agreements in Turkish Law and Asymmetric and Pathological Arbitration Clauses

Yilmaz

Çavuşoğlu

2020

Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Indeterminacy, Ideology and Legitimacy in International Investment Arbitration: Controlling International Private Networks of Legal Governance?

Garcia-Blesa

Juan²

2021

Int J Semiot Law

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article connects the insights of post-realist scholarship about radical indeterminacy and its consequences for the legitimacy of adjudication to the current legitimacy crisis of the international investment regime. In the past few years, numerous studies have exposed serious shortcomings in investment law and arbitration including procedural problems and the substantive asymmetry of the rights protected. These criticisms have prompted a broad consensus in favor of amending the international investment regime and multiple reform proposals have appeared that appeal to the rule of law ideal as an instrument for increasing the acceptability of the international investment system. This article argues that the reliance of such proposals on jurisprudential approaches that fail to adequately accommodate the post-realist indeterminacy critique and take seriously the role of ideology in adjudication renders reform efforts unable to solve the legitimacy problems of the investment regime. The conclusions suggest the need to abandon implausible claims to depoliticization and face the methodological challenges posed by the promise of ideologically balanced assessments advanced by some rule of law theorists. The article finally points at the urgency to reform traditional approaches to doctrinal work in order to increase awareness of critical challenges and open up doctrinal methods to alternative methodological avenues.

show abstract

State Responsibility for Breaches of Investment Contracts

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Bad Faith Conduct of States in Violation of the 'Fair And Equitable Treatment' Standard in International Investment Law and Arbitration

Cited by 30 publications

References 0 publications

Validity of Arbitration Agreements in Turkish Law and Asymmetric and Pathological Arbitration Clauses

Validity of Arbitration Agreements in Turkish Law and Asymmetric and Pathological Arbitration Clauses

Indeterminacy, Ideology and Legitimacy in International Investment Arbitration: Controlling International Private Networks of Legal Governance?

State Responsibility for Breaches of Investment Contracts

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About