1998
DOI: 10.1038/sj.gt.3300607
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Baculovirus-mediated gene transfer in the presence of human serum or blood facilitated by inhibition of the complement system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
124
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
124
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A major drawback in the use of baculovirus vectors for in vivo gene therapy is the inactivation of baculoviruses by the complement system. 56 Complement inactivation of baculoviruses can be overcome by the depletion of viral neutralizing factors in the sera prior to baculovirus infection. 12,56,57 The effects of the complement system have also been overcome by the generation of complement-resistant baculoviruses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A major drawback in the use of baculovirus vectors for in vivo gene therapy is the inactivation of baculoviruses by the complement system. 56 Complement inactivation of baculoviruses can be overcome by the depletion of viral neutralizing factors in the sera prior to baculovirus infection. 12,56,57 The effects of the complement system have also been overcome by the generation of complement-resistant baculoviruses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…56 Complement inactivation of baculoviruses can be overcome by the depletion of viral neutralizing factors in the sera prior to baculovirus infection. 12,56,57 The effects of the complement system have also been overcome by the generation of complement-resistant baculoviruses. 58 In order to test the efficacy of baculovirus vectors prior to in vivo gene therapy, an in vitro system of baculovirusmediated gene transfer with similar hepatocyte biology to the in vivo liver must be established.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been reported that baculovirus vectors produced in insect cells are sensitive to substantial inactivation in vitro by human, rat and guinea-pig serum, and that the vectors have extremely poor infectivity in vivo in mice and rats due to complement inactivation. [28][29][30] By testing gp64-pseudotyped lentiviral vectors, whether the complement sensitivity of baculovirus vectors in rodent serum is due to recognition of the specific envelope glycoprotein or the insect-derived lipid envelope could be evaluated. In this study, the gp64-pseudotyped lentiviral vectors were not inactivated by serum from C57BL/6 mice or Nude rats (Figure 5b).…”
Section: Gp64-pseudotyped Lentiviral Vectors In Vivomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 A shortcoming of these vectors is that they are quickly inactivated by human serum and rodent serum, precluding their effective use in vivo. 15,16 It was proposed that inactivation of these vectors was triggered by human and rodent recognition of insect-specific glycosylation epitopes on the membrane envelope of the vector. 15,17 However, we recently found that lentiviral vectors produced in human cells and pseudotyped with gp64, the major envelope protein of baculovirus, are still inactivated by serum complement from humans but not rodents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15,16 It was proposed that inactivation of these vectors was triggered by human and rodent recognition of insect-specific glycosylation epitopes on the membrane envelope of the vector. 15,17 However, we recently found that lentiviral vectors produced in human cells and pseudotyped with gp64, the major envelope protein of baculovirus, are still inactivated by serum complement from humans but not rodents. 3 This result indicated that at least some component of baculovirus inactivation in human serum is specific to the gp64 protein and not the insect-derived envelope.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%