Abstract:Amber mutants of bacteriophage P1 were used to identify functions involved in late regulation of the P1 lytic growth cycle. A single function has been genetically identified to be involved in activation of the phage-specific late promoter sequence P. In vivo, P1 gene 10 amber mutants fail to trans activate a lacZ operon fusion under the transcriptional control of promoter Ps. Several P1 segments, mapping around position 95 on the P1 chromosome, were cloned into multicopy plasmid vectors. Some of the cloned DNA… Show more
“…Genes of the lytic pathway have been divided into early and late. Transcription of the late genes requires, in addition to bacterial RNA polymerase, a P1-encoded activator protein, Lpa (188), and an E. coli RNA polymeraseassociated stringent starvation protein, SspA (111).…”
P1 is a bacteriophage of Escherichia coli and other enteric bacteria. It lysogenizes its hosts as a circular, low-copy-number plasmid. We have determined the complete nucleotide sequences of two strains of a P1 thermoinducible mutant, P1 c1-100. The P1 genome (93,601 bp) contains at least 117 genes, of which almost two-thirds had not been sequenced previously and 49 have no homologs in other organisms. Protein-coding genes occupy 92% of the genome and are organized in 45 operons, of which four are decisive for the choice between lysis and lysogeny. Four others ensure plasmid maintenance. The majority of the remaining 37 operons are involved in lytic development. Seventeen operons are transcribed from 70 promoters directly controlled by the master phage repressor C1. Late operons are transcribed from promoters recognized by the E. coli RNA polymerase holoenzyme in the presence of the Lpa protein, the product of a C1-controlled P1 gene. Three species of P1-encoded tRNAs provide differential controls of translation, and a P1-encoded DNA methyltransferase with putative bifunctionality influences transcription, replication, and DNA packaging. The genome is particularly rich in Chi recombinogenic sites. The base content and distribution in P1 DNA indicate that replication of P1 from its plasmid origin had more impact on the base compositional asymmetries of the P1 genome than replication from the lytic origin of replication.
“…Genes of the lytic pathway have been divided into early and late. Transcription of the late genes requires, in addition to bacterial RNA polymerase, a P1-encoded activator protein, Lpa (188), and an E. coli RNA polymeraseassociated stringent starvation protein, SspA (111).…”
P1 is a bacteriophage of Escherichia coli and other enteric bacteria. It lysogenizes its hosts as a circular, low-copy-number plasmid. We have determined the complete nucleotide sequences of two strains of a P1 thermoinducible mutant, P1 c1-100. The P1 genome (93,601 bp) contains at least 117 genes, of which almost two-thirds had not been sequenced previously and 49 have no homologs in other organisms. Protein-coding genes occupy 92% of the genome and are organized in 45 operons, of which four are decisive for the choice between lysis and lysogeny. Four others ensure plasmid maintenance. The majority of the remaining 37 operons are involved in lytic development. Seventeen operons are transcribed from 70 promoters directly controlled by the master phage repressor C1. Late operons are transcribed from promoters recognized by the E. coli RNA polymerase holoenzyme in the presence of the Lpa protein, the product of a C1-controlled P1 gene. Three species of P1-encoded tRNAs provide differential controls of translation, and a P1-encoded DNA methyltransferase with putative bifunctionality influences transcription, replication, and DNA packaging. The genome is particularly rich in Chi recombinogenic sites. The base content and distribution in P1 DNA indicate that replication of P1 from its plasmid origin had more impact on the base compositional asymmetries of the P1 genome than replication from the lytic origin of replication.
“…Previously, this gene was indicated to be a late phage gene [14,15], a possibility not readily reconciled with a replication function for the Hot protein. Our present results clearly indicate that hot is not a typical late gene like, as exemplified, for example, by gene 16 in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The previous studies classifying hot as a late gene were based on its promoter structure, containing −22 and −10 elements, rather than −35 and −10 elements, which serve as recognition elements for the late-gene specific P1 transcription factor gp10 [6,14,15]. The hot gene is unusual among this group of genes in that the spacing between the −10 and −22 regions is nine instead of the canonical four [6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of interest in this respect is the previous description of hot as a "late" viral gene [6,14,15]. This classification as a late gene is based on its unusual promoter structure (containing a −10 and −22 consensus sequence rather than the normal −10 and −35 sequence), which has been associated with expression of late phage genes [14,15]. This implies that Hot might not be expressed until the phage packaging stage when DNA replication has largely ceased, a somewhat unusual expression profile for a presumed replication protein.…”
The bacteriophage P1 hot gene product is a homolog of the θ subunit of E. coli DNA polymerase III. Previous studies with hot cloned on a plasmid have shown that Hot protein can substitute for θ, as evidenced by its stabilizing effect on certain dnaQ mutator mutants carrying an unstable pol III proofreading subunit (ε subunit). These results are consistent with Hot, like θ, being a replication protein involved in stabilizing the intrinsically unstable ε proofreading function. However, the function of hot for the viral life cycle is less clear. In the present study, we show that the hot gene is not essential. Based on its promoter structure, hot has been previously classified as a "late" phage gene, a property that is not easily reconciled with a presumed replication function. Here, we clarify this issue by demonstrating that P1 hot is actively expressed both during the lysogenic state and in the early stages of a lytic induction, in addition to its expression in the late stage of phage development. The results indicate that P1 hot has a complex expression pattern, compatible with a model in which Hot may affect the host replication machinery to benefit overall phage replication.
“…In the cycle of vegetative reproduction of the temperate bacteriophage P1, a number of late functions become activated by the product of gene 10 (16,18). Two phage-specific late promoter sequences, P S and LPdar, from which the tail-fiber operon RSU and the dar operon (defense against restriction), respectively, are expressed were identified (10,11,17).…”
Amber and deletion mutants were used to assign functions in cell lysis to three late genes of bacteriophage P1. Two of these genes, lydA and lydB of the dar operon, are 330 and 444 bp in length, respectively, with the stop codon of lydA overlapping the start codon of lydB. The third, gene 17, is 558 bp in length and is located in an otherwise uncharacterized operon. A search with the predicted amino acid sequence of LydA for secondary motifs revealed a holin protein-like structure. Comparison of the deduced amino acid sequence of gene 17 with sequences of proteins in the SwissProt database revealed homologies with the proteins of the T4 lysozyme family. The sequence of lydB is novel and exhibited no known extended homology. To study the effect of gp17, LydA, and LydB in vivo, their genes were cloned in a single operon under the control of the inducible T7 promoter, resulting in plasmid pAW1440. A second plasmid, pAW1442, is identical to pAW1440 but has lydB deleted. Induction of the T7 promoter resulted in a rapid lysis of cells harboring pAW1442. In contrast, cells harboring pAW1440 revealed only a small decrease in optical density at 600 nm compared with cells harboring vector alone. The rapid lysis phenotype in the absence of active LydB suggests that this novel protein might be an antagonist of the holin LydA.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.