2023
DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics12040723
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bacteriophage Adsorption: Likelihood of Virion Encounter with Bacteria and Other Factors Affecting Rates

Abstract: For ideal gasses, the likelihood of collision of two molecules is a function of concentrations as well as environmental factors such as temperature. This too is the case for particles diffusing within liquids. Two such particles are bacteria and their viruses, the latter called bacteriophages or phages. Here, I review the basic process of predicting the likelihoods of phage collision with bacteria. This is a key step governing rates of phage-virion adsorption to their bacterial hosts, thereby underlying a larg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 125 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If we define k as the likelihood of adsorption given, as noted, the presence of one phage and one cell suspended in 1 mL (i.e., per mL) over one min of time (i.e., per min), then instead we might expect units of mL −1 min −1 , which also can be units used for collision kernels more generally [22]: "number of collisions per unit volume and time". That in fact is how k is sometimes expressed [15], including by this author [12]. Thus, while unit analysis provides us with at least an approximation of the expected units of k as based on R 1 , are those units really the expected units of k, as the phage adsorption-rate constant?…”
Section: Unit Analysismentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If we define k as the likelihood of adsorption given, as noted, the presence of one phage and one cell suspended in 1 mL (i.e., per mL) over one min of time (i.e., per min), then instead we might expect units of mL −1 min −1 , which also can be units used for collision kernels more generally [22]: "number of collisions per unit volume and time". That in fact is how k is sometimes expressed [15], including by this author [12]. Thus, while unit analysis provides us with at least an approximation of the expected units of k as based on R 1 , are those units really the expected units of k, as the phage adsorption-rate constant?…”
Section: Unit Analysismentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For phages as antibacterial agents, particularly given phageparticle one-hit killing kinetics [8], pharmacodynamic processes can be distinguished into phages first adsorbing and then their killing resultingly phage-infected bacteria. The rate that bacteria become adsorbed is, in turn, a function of a combination of phage concentrations and what is known as the phage adsorption rate constant [9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are, respectively, some but less than additive increases in the elimination of targeted bacteria relative to each agent acting alone (facilitative), each agent impacting bacteria independently of the other’s actions (additive), and greater than additive bacteria killing (synergism). Synergistic interactions between phages and antibiotics, especially at subinhibitory antibiotic concentrations, can also result in what is described as a phage-antibiotic synergy (PAS) [ 32 , 147 , 179 , 182 , 183 ]. With PAS, the presence of such low antibiotic doses actually enhances certain aspects of phage infection, contrasting the noted potential for higher, inhibitory doses of antibiotics to antagonistically interfere with phage infections.…”
Section: Continuing Challenges For Phage Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If we are considering just a single bacterium, then the average number of adsorptions expected (A c , with the "c" standing for "cell") can be found simply by setting N, the bacterial concentration, to 1 (again keeping in mind that this is all considered as occurring within 1 mL; see Appendix A of [15] for additional detail):…”
Section: Predicting Bacterial Adsorption Likelihood: P(a C )mentioning
confidence: 99%