Bacteriological evaluation for one-and two-piece implant design supporting mandibular overdenture

Abdelwahed, Ahmed; Mahrous, Ahmed; Abadallah, Mohamed Farouk; Asfour, Hani Z.; Aldawash, Hussien A; Alagha, Ebaa Ibrahim

doi:10.4103/0300-1652.171623

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The mandibular overdentures supported by two osseointegrated OPIs had a better effect on bacteriological alterations around the implant abutments than the TPI design, according to Abdelwahed et al . [ 15 ]…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Radiographic and Clinical Evaluation of Implant Prosthetic Treatment with One Piece versus Two Piece Dental Implants: A Comparative Prospective Study

Liji,

Padmasree,

Ajitha

et al. 2023

Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Dental implants are designed to ensure natural tooth replacement based on improved design, simplified placement, and long-term survival. This study aimed to compare one-piece implant (OPI) and two-piece implant (TPI) to determine the success rate over the TPI. This study conducted on 15 patients selected with the age range of 20–60 years to place OPI and TPI. The surgical consent form duly signed by the patients was procured. The implants used were of Adin Implant System, and a follow-up examination was done at 3, 6, and 9 months after implant loading and various clinical and radiographic parameters were noted for both OPI and TPI. The clinical parameters measured were Silness, and Loe gingival index and probing depth and the radiographic parameters included crestal marginal bone loss. Independent Sample t-test and ANOVA were used for statistical analysis. The statistical analysis showed no significant difference between the OPI and TPI based on the gingival index, probing depth, and crestal bone loss. On the contrary, there was a statistical significance in comparing the same parameters during the follow-up period of 3, 6, and 9 months. Over a protracted period, OPIs are better than TPIs by the design and placement procedure. Further research with a higher sample size shall possibly establish esoteric results on a large scale.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Radiographic and Clinical Evaluation of Implant Prosthetic Treatment with One Piece versus Two Piece Dental Implants: A Comparative Prospective Study

Liji,

Padmasree,

Ajitha

et al. 2023

Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

The biological width around implant

Zhang

Xie

et al. 2021

J Prosthodont Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: The concept of biological width has been proposed and widely used in oral implantation. This review aimed to summarize the biological width around implant in detail. Study selection: An electronic search of the literature prior to March 2019 was performed to identify all articles related to biological width in periimplant soft tissue. The search was conducted in the MEDLINE (National Library of Medicine) database accessed through PubMed with no date restriction. The following main keywords were used: "implant", "biological width", "soft tissue", "junctional epithelium", "peri-implant epithelium", "connective tissue", "gingiva", "mucosa" (connecting multiple keywords with AND, OR). Results: The identified researches focused on several aspects related to biological width in oral implantation, namely the concept, formation, remodeling, dimension, structure and function. Conclusions: Based on of the reviewed literature, the concept, formation, remodeling, structure, dimension, and functional significances of periimplant biological width are explored in this narrative review. The formation of biological width around implant is a complex process after several weeks of healing. The biological width around implant is a 3-4mm distance from the top of the peri-implant mucosa to the first bone-to-implant contact or the stabilized top of the adjacent bone, consisting of sulcular epithelium, junctional epithelium and fibrous connective tissue between the epithelium and the first bone-to-implant contact or the stabilized top of the adjacent bone. The biological width forms a biological barrier against the bacteria, influences the remodeling of soft and hard tissue around implant and has implications for clinical aspects of dental implantation.

show abstract

Bacteriological evaluation for one-and two-piece implant design supporting mandibular overdenture

Cited by 2 publications

References 9 publications

Radiographic and Clinical Evaluation of Implant Prosthetic Treatment with One Piece versus Two Piece Dental Implants: A Comparative Prospective Study

Radiographic and Clinical Evaluation of Implant Prosthetic Treatment with One Piece versus Two Piece Dental Implants: A Comparative Prospective Study

The biological width around implant

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About