1979
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(79)90654-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bacteriological Criteria for Feeding Raw Breast-Milk to Babies on Neonatal Units

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

11
26
0
2

Year Published

1981
1981
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
11
26
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…27 Fortunately, this report of raw donor milk use among preterm infants documented few adverse clinical effects, and, in addition, preterm mother's own milk was found to be similar to donor human milk in that both had bacterial colonization in the range of <10 5 CFU=mL. 27 This is consistent with our findings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…27 Fortunately, this report of raw donor milk use among preterm infants documented few adverse clinical effects, and, in addition, preterm mother's own milk was found to be similar to donor human milk in that both had bacterial colonization in the range of <10 5 CFU=mL. 27 This is consistent with our findings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Samples containing 105 CFU/ml or less were classified following the rec ommendations of Carroll ct al. [8]: class I: milk consid ered as sterile (no growth after overnight incubation); class II: milk containing saprophytes: class III: milk containing potential pathogens (Staphylococcus au reus, Enterococci, group B streptococci, Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa). Samples con taining more than 105 CFU/ml were rejected because never used for nutrition.…”
Section: Bacteriological a Italy Sismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different ways of storing arc possible (refrigeration at 0-4°C, freezing at -20°C with or without pasteurization): up to now the bacterial content of milk determines the way it is stored. Bacterial contamination of human milk is common but the extent and type of contamination [8,9] vary. Human milk can be contaminated during collection, during preparation of the milk in the syringes and during administration, after bacterial growth in the milk kept at room temperature for 3-4 h when given to the babies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…31 In general, previous studies have revealed low proportions with coliform contamination (Enterobacter ,1%-7%, E coli 0%-2%, Klebsiella sp 0.4%-9%) compared with 44% of Internet samples here. 19,[32][33][34][35] Staphylococcus epidermidis and Viridans streptococci are common skin flora and not usually pathogenic. The prevalence of Staphylococcus sp in the …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%