2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2008.12.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bacterial toxicity comparison between nano- and micro-scaled oxide particles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

21
374
6
7

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 727 publications
(408 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
21
374
6
7
Order By: Relevance
“…An antibacterial effect can also be due to the physical impact nanoparticles have on the cells (microabrasion, surface rigidification, bacterial flocculation) [76]. These effects do not rely on the chemical nature, and are thus expected to be of lower magnitude, on par with unreactive nanoparticulate systems (nanodiamonds, SiO 2 , Al 2 O 3 ) [77][78][79].…”
Section: Role Of the Nanoparticulate Objectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An antibacterial effect can also be due to the physical impact nanoparticles have on the cells (microabrasion, surface rigidification, bacterial flocculation) [76]. These effects do not rely on the chemical nature, and are thus expected to be of lower magnitude, on par with unreactive nanoparticulate systems (nanodiamonds, SiO 2 , Al 2 O 3 ) [77][78][79].…”
Section: Role Of the Nanoparticulate Objectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After BSA/HA treatment, the Al 2 O 3 NPs obviously show better dispersion when compared with the untreated NPs, but the SiO 2 NPs look very similar to the untreated NPs. The TiO 2 NPs were reported as tending to form large and compact agglomerates (Jiang et al, 2009;Keller et al, 2010). BSA treatments make TiO 2 NPs less compact and the BSA coatings on the NPs agglomerates can be observed, but HA induces more compact agglomerates.…”
Section: Effects Of Bsa and Ha On Nps Agglomeration Observed By Tem Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The harmful effects of ZnONPs are driven by their physicochemical properties (dissolution and formation rate, the morphology and chemical composition, surface reactivity, particle number) and the resulting physical damage caused by the aggregation and agglomeration of nanoparticles (Bai et al, 2010;Jiang et al, 2009;Zhang et al, 2010. The bio-kinetic behaviour and in vivo toxicity of ZnONP exposure has, to date, been investigated in several non-mammalian systems including in vitro cell-based assays (Sharma et al, 2012a,b;Ahamed et al, 2011;Wu et al, 2010), bacteria (Li et al, 2011;Reddy et al, 2007), algae (Franklin et al, 2007), plants (Lin and Xing, 2007), crustaceans (Poynton et al, 2011), fish (Bai et al, 2010), earthworms (Hooper et al, 2011) and nematodes (Khare et al, 2011;Ma et al, 2009;Ma et al, 2011;Roh et al, 2009;Wu et al, 2013). The nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, a powerful model organism due to the availability of a completely sequenced genome (Hillier et al, 2005) and many molecular genetics tools has been used in ecotoxicological research to study the molecular to organismal level responses to ROS and heavy metal challenges (Roh et al, 2006;Hughes and Sturzenbaum 2007;Swain et al, 2004Swain et al, , 2010Zeitoun-Ghandour et al, 2010; The roles of the metalloproteins metallothionein (MT) and phytochelatin (PC) are Furthermore, ZnONP mediated toxicity may result from the release of free ionic zinc (George et al 2010;Li et al, 2012;Poynton et al, 2011;Wang et al, 2009), which induces cellular damage via the generation of free reactive oxygen species (ROS), which in turn can promote pro-inflammatory effects Mocchegiani et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%