1995
DOI: 10.3354/dao021227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bacterial species other than Renibacterium salmoninarum cross-react with antisera against R. salmoninarum but are negative for the p57 gene of R. salmoninarum as detected by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR)

Abstract: NOTEBacterial species other than Renibacterium salmoninarum cross-react with antisera against R. salmoninarum but are negative for the p57 gene of R. salmoninarum as detected by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) ABSTRACT: Genomc DNA was extracted from 4 strains of Carnobacterium p~scicola and 2 strains of Corynebacterium aquaticum that had previously been reported to produce a 57 kDa protein that reacted with polyclonal antiserum against Renibacterium salmoninarum. Genomic DNA was also extracted from a Gram-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The criteria by which we selected bacteria to confirm the specificity of the primers used in the nested PCR were that a given bacterium must either be a common bacterial pathogen of salmonids, or a species reported previously to produce false-positive reactions in the ELISA. Our results support those of others (Mattsson et al 1993, Brown et al 1995, Hariharan et al 1995) that nucleic acid-based assays may be used to accurately diagnose R. salmoninarum if one selects primers that amplify a DNA sequence that is unique to the kidney disease bacterium. Primer specificity, however, is only one factor in avoiding false-positive reactions in a nested PCR.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The criteria by which we selected bacteria to confirm the specificity of the primers used in the nested PCR were that a given bacterium must either be a common bacterial pathogen of salmonids, or a species reported previously to produce false-positive reactions in the ELISA. Our results support those of others (Mattsson et al 1993, Brown et al 1995, Hariharan et al 1995) that nucleic acid-based assays may be used to accurately diagnose R. salmoninarum if one selects primers that amplify a DNA sequence that is unique to the kidney disease bacterium. Primer specificity, however, is only one factor in avoiding false-positive reactions in a nested PCR.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The accuracies of serologically based diagnostic methods for R. salmoninai-um, such as the ELISA and the FAT, have been under question because of reports of cross-reacting bacteria (Austin et al 1985, Dixon 1985, Bandin et al 1993, Brown et al 1995, Wood et al 1995. The criteria by which we selected bacteria to confirm the specificity of the primers used in the nested PCR were that a given bacterium must either be a common bacterial pathogen of salmonids, or a species reported previously to produce false-positive reactions in the ELISA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the role of p57 in pathogenesis is unclear, this protein is a well-accepted marker of infection by R. salmoninarum (6,11,13,34,37,41). The correlation of cell-associated p57 with isolate virulence, the high levels of synthesis by R. salmoninarum, the in vitro binding activity with fish leukocytes, and the maintenance of duplicated msa genes support the hypothesis that p57 plays an important role in the pathogenesis of bacterial kidney disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Diagnosis of R. salmoninarum infection in salmon is often based on detection of the 57-kDa (p57) protein, mRNA, or DNA (6,11,13,34,37,41). p57 is a good marker of active infection as this protein is the predominant cell surface and secreted protein produced by R. salmoninarum (23,26,51).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Antisera against R. salmoninarum can cross-react with other bacterial species, resulting in false-positive reactions. 1,5,43 The same polyclonal antibody preparation was used in the MF-FAT and the ELISA, although the tests differ because the MF-FAT detects antigens of R. salmoninarum in association with the bacterial cell, whereas the ELISA detects an extracellular antigenic fraction. The sensitivity of the MF-FAT, about 25 bacteria/ml or the observation of only 1 bacterium in 150 microscope fields, means that careful attention is necessary to avoid cross-contamination of the ovarian fluid samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%